chloroquine side effects buy deltasone in usa is there a generic for zyrtec nizoral pills medication buy vermox hong kong ginseng perth australia fixime 400 mg best price proventil hfa how to use royal king panax ginseng extract buy bentyl boots purchase clomid using paypal dapoxetine 30mg price delhi what does bactrim pill look like la pillola yasmin “· sicura al 100 buy januvia generic ephedraxin best price what class of drug is hyzaar normoxic trimix anafranil coupons propecia ordering no prescription western drug inderal purim billig kaufen lopressor shoppers drug mart adalat online store can order pulmicort online diflucan dose for yeast methotrexate dose for psoriasis diclofenac lawsuit settlements when does ginseng season start in indiana side effects of ditropan tablets benicar prescription only buy urispas paypal silagra for purchase comprar capoten original en madrid trazedone for sale items order trial erection packs 2 maxalt mlt generic price naltrexone alcohol dependence leukeran tablets online can i buy phenergan online without a prescription? online sale of elavil order generic periactin cheapest citalopram tablets uk the atlantic mexico drug war bystolic reviews mitral valve prolapse online purchase of medicines in delhi indian buy alesse vasotec australia price sinequan online shipping med cab aceon redustat 120 precio overnight pharmacy cialis professional cystone cheap uk ordering cialis soft prescription lowest phenergan online forum cheap buy prescription teva-prednisone 50 mg tablet buy liposafe xr without prescription class action lipitor lawsuit 2010 feldene capsules 20 mg alcohol consumption finasteride and prostate cancer risk permethrin 5 online no prescription generic uk paypal finax generic premarin acheter lamisilate’Ø monodose 1 anti malaria medication chloroquine indocin pill shortage buy lotensin with metformin combination clomid aricept online uk comprar buspar original en madrid zantac effervescent tablets 150 mg wellbutrin side effects decreased libido yagara with american express roxithromycin suppositories buy order evecare online with visa buy albendazole pills prescription evista pas cher levitra professional medication order atrovent generic release date buspar mg order propranolol suppliers overseas canadian tricor tablet levaquin lawsuits 2012 meloxicam 7.5mg generic levaquin walgreens legal buy chloroquine online canada what is triamterene hctz 37.5 25 used for buy obagi tretinoin cream 0.1 purchase generic zofran viagra vs cialis pfizer viagra saroten zovirax buy online ceftin mexico pharmacy zanaflex online ordering where can i get menosan no prescription levaquin fincar medication order buy januvia next day eurax 10 mg cost ophthacare canadian pharmacy emsam generic for recommended dosage of lasix buying levitra professional in manchester purchase generic lynoral how to use lasix to pass a drug test what types of cialis super active are there is there a generic for proventil what drug category is flomax craigslist usa california sacramento does cialis professional work disgrasil 120 mg dosis how to use bupron sr canada africa health alliance vigrande fiyatlari over the counter shuddha guggulu medication admin asst liv work over the counter dutasteride where to buy accutane in canada cheap buying trimox how much does generic plan b cost order vytorin online uk aciphex 20 generic what is the generic brand for allegra free viagra pills order retail viagra price is generic finasteride as effective as propecia viagra plus pills sweat acquisto anafranil sicuro online mexico pharmacy periactin order is nexium an over the counter medication price of levitra in canada cabana overnight rx diclofenac gel price buy ciplox 50 forzest online ordering prescription drug viagra professional cheap lamisil no prescription best venlor prices cheapest area to live in the uk diamox sr capsules chlamydia treatment free lamictal rash picture a comprehensive view cost celebrex costco where do i buy seroflo cheap omnicef buy online how to import coreg buy crestor buy tretinoin gel usp is risperdal available as a generic medrol steroid injection secure tabs valacyclovir dosage for herpes zoster buy eulexin australia valtrex uk pharmacy zanaflex suppliers overseas buy generic acai with bonus relion ventolin discontinued long time side effects ditropan toprol xl dosage for arrhythmia what is phenergan vc codeine syrup cheap fertility drugs canada viagra dosage age 30 wellbutrin cost canada carafate next day shipping buying clomid over the counter max men;s handicap valacyclovir (valtrex) where to buy premarin online usa high blood pressure pill from canada inhaler sale uk required ventolin zocor pills non persciption adalat ordering levitra super active cialis generic ventolin switzerland supreme suppliers + cialis how to get desyrel in australia where can i get champix nhs ginseng prices per pound 2012 ohio buy cheap benicar online drug acivir pills spain montelukast asthmatic smoker study atarax delivery diclofenac 500mg tablet mexican pharmacy no prescription flonase generic retino-a cream 0,025 usa pharmacy risperdal online store buy gabapentin online uk where doo you buy alligator clips pharmacy ce new drugs 2010 where can i buy viagra in melbourne camere web live in italia silagra no how much does augmentin xr cost ventolin shop non prescription cafergot pharmacy hoodia generico online viagra works better than levitra mail order glucotrol xl lipitor commercial location actoplus met sold over counter canada prescriptions filled flagyl dosage for dental infection prescription crestor rosuvastatin buspar on line for sale no script avodart online without prescription revista visao is aciphex better than prilosec reviews on prandin how to purchase citalopram lotensin cheap uk female viagra cheap price order synthroid in brahmi looking for viagra women fertility treatment where to buy remeron online antabuse generic price what is motrin for children concurrent use of pletal and plavix atacand 16 mg price lilly cialis buy is dostinex a prescription drug buy levaquin in mexico viagra sublingual overnight levlen delivery uk canadian malegra fxt tablet singulair suppliers overseas buy paroxetine online uk no prescription buy hydrochlorothiazide discount side effects of propranolol medication diovan cost at cvs lowest price cymbalta clozaril ordering online pharmacy haldol injection dose best generic norvasc sites buy diarex greece how to tell if my viagra is fake maxalt drugs for sale discount alli weight loss aid cialis oral uses buy generic paroxetine prescription buy carafate online toradol online pharmacy long time side effects brand cialis fincar medication online metoclopramide for men sale in uk there generic alphagan online pharmacy apcalis sx buy coreg 100mg online doxycycline 100mg dosage uti capoten refills amantadine by mail order where to buy periactin appetite stimulant approved buy lotrisone online overnight buy alphagan canada cheap on line medications cheap generic zovirax generic drug for allegra d 24 hour what is tofranil pm remeron to buy in australia rico pharmacy where to get doxycycline for dogs buy serpina usa where can i buy ortho tri cyclen online without a prescription qsymia price in india buy elimite in usa order metoclopramide no rx canadian pharmacy adderall online l-tryptophan shoppers drug mart synthroid delivery uk prazosin dose for bph american prograf proventil buy australia online generic micardis altace medication dosage where to buy tretinoin buy misoprostol uk what color are methotrexate pills what is phenergan vc with codeine viagra spain buy diclofenac overnight online pharmacy free delivery asacol generic available buy antivert otc cvs mail order pharmacy jobs calcium carbonate uses medication suprax generic online diclofenac 40 mg buy flagyl mg pariet without prescription canada glycomet to buy in england registered online pharmacies where can i buy viagra in ireland vasotec for men in usa buy mestinon in singapore lanoxin roche precio argentina generic viagra from india safety bystolic dose equivalent metoprolol acheter accutane en ligne en france least expensive propecia from canada can cymbalta get you high que pastillas sirven para abortar en mexico how long does it take for flomax to begin to work parlodel maximum dosage brand viagra online usa mail order apcalis sx side effects of lamictal in children diclofenac discounted olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide fixed-dose combination in hypertension does flovent inhaler cause weight gain vermox italiano brand amoxil price india overnight finpecia ordering medrol dose pack hyzaar 100 mg fiyat” brand advair diskus for men in usa alternative to premarin hrt missed dose of synthroid while pregnant zanaflex where to get buy fosamax online overnight blue pill uk promethazine online usa citalopram dosage range what is toprol xl used for xalatan lawsuit canada ambien uk equivalent canada online pharmacy no prescription cialis soft tabs what is levothyroxine tablets for propranolol drug in fr pharmacy side effects of prometrium in early pregnancy what is actoplus met made of generic uroxatral safe methotrexate pill shortage 2012 abilify prices levitra tablets wiki viagra no prior prescription where did aspirin come from zyprexa olanzapine generic atrovent dose in children viagra sublingual drugs for sale taking bactrim for uti quickest clonidine side effects of stopping exelon patch lipitor to purchase without a prescription aceon prescription drugs blood donepezil hydrochloride mechanism of action hoodia pills drugstore betnovate supplier in uk overnight pharmacy cardizem feldene 40mg what is the generic name for zyrtec d where purchase tricor toprol xl medication online liv 52 maximum dosage cheap estrace india cheap alphagan what is asacol ec used for cytotec price in south africa order stromectol mastercard buy online roaccutane without diamox cheap buy pulmicort uk cyproheptadine for cats dose bactrim ds for uncomplicated uti buy lady era 10 buy flomax pills in the australia dramamine for motion sickness reviews can you buy viagra on line brand trial erection packs 2 for sale what is diclofenac used for in cattle plendil medication coupon divya pharmacy online india where cane i buy albendazole pros and cons of testosterone therapy for men requip generic picture billig oxytrol online kaufen canadian voltaren gel himcolin legal in england what does nitrofurantoin cure toprol xl settlement enalapril maleate tablets purchase proventil inhaler brand cialis medication where to buy buy cyklokapron in india online order yasmin on line mexico generic pill identifier xanax levlen cheap us pharmacy buy prednisone online australia no prescription dog anti anxiety pills tsa search viagra low cost drugs albendazole mg mechanism of action of metoclopramide in migraine cost of proscar where to buy levitra professional buy differin 80 mg online anxiety treatment for children wellbutrin sr or xl buy cheap brand viagra pills didronel medicine children order xenical online no prescription what is the dosage for benadryl for a 3 year old can you buy cialis sublingual in ireland online drug tadalafil nature;s bounty acai 1000 mg softgels ampicillin dosage dogs can you buy aciclovir tablets over the counter uk prescription generic for medrol dose pack viagra soft 10 mg cost wellbutrin sr online pharmacy uk lisinopril zestril 20 mg buy kytril ashwagandha drugstore.com levaquin canadian source mail order generic amitriptyline erythromycin pills online in the mexico lexus rx 350 reviews canada how much does terramycin cost allopurinol tablets from buy benadryl cough syrup india price mexican pharmacies sell adderall cabgolin for men sale in uk buy cialis generic kamagra prednisone tablets lot p1i300 where to get cialis cheap canada and xenical how much will yagara cost increasing function calculator side effects of allegra in kids alli weight loss programme iv nexium dose sale mircette protonix dose iv bystolic in italia are there generic ed drugs is alesse better than yasmin protonix side effects in men viramune brand positioning ordering zestoretic what is doxycycline used to treat buy proscar with paypal brand viagra order on web comprar prandin pela internet rhinocort tablets price antivert ships from india mestinon 60 mg in india kytril mail order what is triamterene hctz for acquistare altace in italia is benicar better than micardis does taking elavil cause weight gain flonase long term use side effects doxycycline antibiotic- can you drink alcohol minipress order in the us side effects of rhinocort turbuhaler lotensin pharmacy coupons buying levitra super active for dogs lisinopril 40 mg best price how long does it take to get over a liver biopsy seroquel perth australia taking two allegra pills anacin suppositories buy acyclovir cream age levitra professional where to purchase himcolin uk next day delivery viral reactive arthritis minomycin reviews name brand viagra - canadian pharmacy diflucan pill - pharmacy purchase levitra mexico best place buy feldene pct generic endep overnite shipping levitra comprare online purchase generic geriforte cefixime online pharmacy uk erexor tablets from buy price buy generic differin gel buy generic retin-a 0,05 online best online pharmacy generic albenza buy rogaine 5 online no prescription us cymbalta generic alternative generic from xalatan ampicillin msds fisher side effects of trileptal lady era pills cialis professional 40 mg dose can buy kamagra shop bactrim suspension 40mg-200mg dosis where can you buy benadryl cheapest drug cialis super active generic alli for sale on line where to buy differin from feldene generic name can colchicine cause weight gain cialis super active supplier in uk precio de topamax en mexico fucidin 40 mg dose how much does doxycycline cost uk india pharmacies online that sell diflucan prednisolone now co uk accutane complications pregnancy digoxin direct pharmacy zyvox antibiotic treatment zoloft 50 mg cost purchase tamoxifen citrate cheap citalopram cost no insurance ordering singulair online prescription drugs for sale in canada how to by coreg online cafergot next day delivery nitrofurantoin perth australia epivir-hbv usa sale procardia drug class long time side effects floxin what is diltiazem drugs non persciption eurax how to use tetracycline antibiotics adderall online pharmacy india buy betnovate cream online side effects of sibutramine hydrochloride cleocin cream side effects buy atarax generic serophene limited india chloramphenicol non perscription countries buy proscar mg online for l-tryptophan tablets from buy torsemide shortage 2012 genuine bupropion best price doxycycline hyclate uses for std where to buy cefadroxil ointment canada pilex tablets online generic zoloft overnite shipping buy orlistat tablets online nexium and pregnancy first trimester get atarax toronto trandate for discount acyclovir and alcohol drink alls pill shop discount code mexican pharmacy no prescription himplasia healthy man viagra ad amoxil without prescription bactrim ds tablet vpxl phone orders viramune online order buy kamagra oral jelly without a prescription from canadian pharmacy what is paroxetine 20mg order fucidin lowest price pill rx health revia products where to get benicar pct qsymia user reviews beconase aq tablets 150 mg combivent online meds albendazole drug store online apply pilex ointment best online pharmacy generic tofranil benzac pills drugstore buy generic flonase online with prescription pharmacy that sells augmentin online pharmacy fluoxetine hcg injections pharmacy escrow what is the dosage for reglan buying levothroid mylan-baclofen 10 mg side effects order flagyl on line usa buy mifeprex online fast diovan valsartan micronase without rx online amoxil purchase ortho tri-cyclen reviews acne org costco american express canada phone number comprar penegra en argentina clomid success rate cycle colchicine tablets over counter alli simpson tumblr blogs generic form for motrin cleocin pharmacy order roxithromycin 300 mg tablets side effects how much does pyridium cost comprar toprol xl pela internet etodolac mail order india research grade micardis get celebrex las vegas buy tegretol inhaler canada aldactone from usa pharmacy antivert where to get is it legal to purchase medicine from canada order parlodel viagra local pickup buy desyrel fast shipping citalopram india price order non generic nexium best canadian drugs online cheap actos per pill mg buy cheapest generic viagra online provera medication side effects safe buy brahmi online best price ampicillin buy buspar without a script ordering viagra online in india buy seroflo online usa cheap drugstore foundation side effects of generic zoloft sildenafil ratiopharm kaufen where to buy detrol ralista pills ditropan usa cvs prices flagyl s suspension no prescription phenamax sale flomax pills online in the uk viagra generic online reviews buy cialis super active without a prescription from canadian pharmacy pharmacy japan allopurinol online online etodolac india buy nitroglycerin no prescription moduretic india buy zyloprim boots pharmacy non prescription pamelor pharmacy buy cheap advair diskus online 50mcg is motilium over the counter in canada zyloprim pharmacy order purchase ventolin australia uk version of lexapro genuine caverta 100mg cheap tadalis sx 100 mg thyroxine hormone tablets micardis plus generic name generic relafen prescription drug zovirax dutas (generic dutasteride) abilify legal in england flomax mexico companies only order amitriptyline online in usa top 10 online sarafem sites diflucan for sale philippines ordering advair diskus uk cheap methotrexate usa buy lotrisone mg aciclovir online legally cymbalta 60 mg price canada buy pletal 50 order diamox advair diskus composition best place to order remeron in us what is chloroquine ph how to order free birth control online best place to order viagra plus in us cost of ciprodex otic beconase aq low dose birth control buy cabana cheap approved maxaman without a prescription skelaxin dosage back pain fastest amitriptyline uk delivery buy provera uk cheap generic cafergot how long does it take for citalopram to be out of your system buy alphagan 2.0 furosemide birth control online us side effects of nexium esomeprazole 20mg buy generic lexapro cheap buy kytril 80 mg online brand zoloft buy topamax online uk cafergot looking for finasteride usarlo buy online zofran generic zantac 150 rx what are celebrex pills used for can you buy clozaril in ireland resources for viagra super active suhagra woldwide shipping glucophage canada prescription fluoxetine medication topamax dose weight loss no prescription coumadin buy lithium aspartate canada female viagra sildenafil side effects cardizem discount coupon what does isoptin treat generic drug name for synthroid tretinoin 0,025 with paypal payment acheter pas cher cymbalta buy tricor from mexico online herbal tincture suppliers uk vytorin and grapefruit can i get pregnant while taking topamax florida ethionamide safe vermox no prescription alli weight loss capsules 84 capsules female viagra generic for altace without rx cheapest place to buy nizagara noroxin alcohol side effects sublingual nifedipine dose buy diclofenac lexapro 10 mg reviews cymbalta withdrawal uk xenical no prescription uk lithium prices chart cheapest kytril in the uk aldactone 25 mg bijsluiter can you buy hydrochlorothiazide in ireland atarax over the counter uk zestoretic pills billig roxithromycin online kaufen medication cheap diarex prescription finpecia india no prescription buy alli diet pills england drugs no prescription medications online claritin over the counter antihistamines revatio 20 mg cost where can i find cheap plavix what does famvir do buy benadryl-d online best anxiety medication for teenagers prescription 15 buy mobic zerit online actoplus met over the counter bactroban online overnight shipping discount code for asacol meloxicam 7.5mg side effects finax canada prescription viagra soft tabs online ventolin hfa inhaler viagra sin receta espa“a abilify without a script generic content by conran ltd comprar alli online andorra atacand from usa caverta with no rx betnovate n cream on sale mail-order cardizem cheap zerit sale uk lipitor capsules tamoxifen and weight gain low cost overnight elavil what does the drug phenergan see is there a generic form of avapro chloromycetin shopping order carbozyne overnight purchase premarin 0.625 mg where to buy testosterone cream for women primatene mist available walmart getting betapace in australia anxiety nhs self help prozac weight gain message boards acheter du baclofene en ligne buy fincar 100mg online keflex side effects in dogs cialis commercial new headphones how to order ortho tri-cyclen buy lanoxin 0.25 mg digoxin prices cvs nolvadex tamoxifen side effects better than keppra where to buy amantadine in canada safely buy cheap acticin online drug discount canadian pharmacy allegra where can i buy clomid over the counter citrate zetia drugstore com eulexin with no rx altace delivery uk comprar arjuna original gerniac celias do the make v-gel where can i buy it percocet erowid dose cheap imuran uk buy elocon bulk primatene mist inhalers for sale best generic zyvox sites purchase viramune can i get prometrium how to get off metformin fluconazole dosage for men mevacor uses medication trazodone for sale female cialis no prescription reviews prilosec over counter dosages where to order accutane online salvent inhaler unisom doxylamine succinate 25 mg reglan tablets 40mg top ten pharmaceutical companies in india 2012 can your buy levitra super active in ireland viagra can i get high off meloxicam 15 mg buy doxazosin perth australia caverta generic reviews buy viagra for women uk approved pharmacy brand cialis barato buy female viagra online overnight atorlip-10 pas cher dosage of endep for pain buyers of ophthacare canada paxil over the counter clomid cycle 5 analysis of aspirin tablets ib triamterene noprescrition needed canada online pharmacy female cialis canada antivert pharmacy order buy viagra on line from canada lowest priced avalide celebrex without a prescription from canada hyzaar forte 28 tablet ila“º propranolol online pay paypal saw palmetto weight gain women cheap genuine zestril online how to take phenergan generic for crestor canada viagra brandon marshall 12 days of christmas parody advair diskus to buy in the uk without a prescription furosemide 10 mg for sale rosuvastatin patient reviews lexapro no prescription compare prices can order metformin online altace online forum can i take 2 allegra pills shelf life of lopressor generic atrovent uk paypal can you buy tretinoin 0,05 over the counter generic drugs made india safe buy tricorn hat leather what does reglan diflucan generic cheap costs what is lotrisone cream used to treat cialis jelly 100mg buy how to buy viagra in singapore purchase prednisolone on line in india levitra 5mg tablets buying viagra in cancun mexico all types of drugs pics can buy erexor online zyprexa online overnight buy betnovate n online codeine promethazine price is it legal to buy domperidone from canada cialis da 50 mg wellbutrin 75 mg tablet chloromycetin sale pharmacy no prescription uk aldactone 100 uses lopressor cheap uk best place buy lioresal yasmin non perscription countries allegra 30 mg disintegrating tablet order ranitidine from pfizer viagra online cheap dosage of amitriptyline for depression aleve price canada anacin discontinued zaditor tablets price xenical delivered to uk online pharmacy no prescription needed lozol levitra walmart $9 buy dostinex pills in the mexico evista from canadian pharmacy mail order dapoxetine nexium medicine information buy generic yasmin online lexapro side effects withdrawal celexa suppliers overseas aceon pharmacies safe depakote no prescription brand viagra supplier in uk buying bulk doxycyline for dogs buy herbal viagra online uk cordarone limited india over counter zocor how to use revia viagra preis deutschland can you take grifulvin v daily orlistat order canada ultra low dose amantadine generic drug robaxin lantus side effects medrol drugs online purchases viagra comprar no brasil is it safe to order penegra code red 7 reviews betnovate-n gsk buy shallaki australia where can your buy valtrex buy baclofen bulk american viagra professional can i make betnovate pharmacy mexico clonidine haldol online overnight shipping lipitor 40 mg side effects brahmi tablets uk where to buy cytotec drugs online what is propranolol pills used for risperdal generic available how many days to take bactrim for uti valacyclovir dosage for fever blisters albenza shop net buy brand cialis discount crestor pharmacy prices buy lopid online no prescription canada cheap suprax 200 mg what is the dosage for claritin reditabs buy trandate without rx cheap hyaluronic acid sale uk valacyclovir hcl 5 mg side effects betneval creme indication indian zyvox buspar reviews anxiety singulair pharmacy assistance generic clomid cost sarafem capsules discount prescriptions for seniors medications mailed from drugstore ontario canada can you buy acai berry optimum at a store effexor xr withdrawal symptoms list where to buy amitriptyline with visa birth control pills minocin receta para comprar viagra en mexico where periactin dulcolax pills colonoscopy prep pantoprazole infusion pediatric albuterol sulfate inhaler overdose lisinopril from canada dutas generic for side effects of baclofen 10 mg what is toprol xl made of buy ampicillin online mexico no prescription femara from usa pharmacy med cab levitra is there a drug comparative to deltasone flagyl dosage for dogs with diarrhea buy actoplus met xr approved buy sominex online in usa cheap allegra d what does coreg medicine do where purchase zyloprim estrofem uk motilium uk pharmacy what is viagra yahoo levitra haridra sold over counter compazine side effects webmd top 10 online dutas sites carafate classification lexapro weight gain percentage side effects of ashwagandha churna voveran dose in children donde puedo comprar hoodia gordonii most reliable place to buy seroflo online erection packs 2 online no prescription order ginseng overnight cvs pharmacy support staff doxycycline atarax india sale buy hoodia hong kong Purchase levaquin 750 mg alesse birth control reviews yahoo answers what are the differences of crocodiles and alligators is there a drug comparative to hydrochlorothiazide how much does flagyl 500 mg cost rumalaya forte purchase in canada no prescription what does motilium look like buy periactin boots buy tvs echeck order digoxin tablets minocin medication most reliable place to buy terramycin online toradol pharmacy prices list canada drugs cefixime with prescription flovent for cats canada evista 60 mg film coated tablets list of tesco stores selling fluoxetine over counter statins uk online buy diarex discount ophthacare non perscription countries aurochem pharmaceuticals private limited levitra prescription assistance program sale renagel what is relafen for snorting adderall effects voltaren schmerzgel online kaufen buy astelin cheap canadian drug fluconazole 150 for sale online cheap generic aldactone buy online bactroban pill shortage ordering zestril here in canada dostinex medicine side effects buy genuine norvasc uk what drug category is effexor xr imitrex medication class buy micardis pills online brand name seroflo online buying albendazole in manchester where to buy nizoral 2013 genzyme renagel revela liquid quibron-t review cialis super active looking for buy rogaine 5 mg lexapro in croatia vpxl side effects coversyl medication for blood pressure perindopril buy coreg mg can you buy the birth control pill over the counter get aleve toronto non generic dipyridamole viagra soft where can i buy generic leukeran uk paypal prilosec india price how to take zantac 300 mg betnovate eczema ointment cheap danazol 100 mg can you buy mircette online detrol order by phone quiero comprar amitriptyline generic amoxil cost where to buy depakote drugs online indocin 5mg tablets order norvasc canada confido pharmacy order no prescription mevacor sale how long to take albendazole cheap nizagara uk ordering low dose nootropil buy diprosone uk ciprofloxacino 500 mg dose optimal metformin dose for pcos buyers of cytoxan canada canadian family pharmacy.org rhinocort on line no script cheap tablets abilify online use ampicillin coupon online propranolol 5mg tablets side effects of lioresal order amaryl 2mg side effects of rosuvastatin teva best place to buy carbozyne order plavix medication donde puedo comprar apcalis sx nymphomax from usa buy artane capsules lexapro from india amitriptyline online coupon code morning after pill bleeding after where cefadroxil st. museum canadian allied forces prevacid 24hr printable coupons clorfenamina english translation can you order astelin revatio online in canada is buying viagra online illegal online cefixime india can you get high off allegra cost of citalopram without insurance long term side effects of pulmicort respules buy celadrin visa i want to pay some endep generic from viramune plavix purchase in canada no prescription cardura for sale australia discount lisinopril from lipitor meclizine where can i buy it original rocaltrol online artane online cheap online generic benadryl buy aleve with e check tricor maitland florida elocon birth control online australia natural herbal alternatives to viagra nexium 40 mg cap buy generic amaryl online no prescription trental 600 compresse costo how to make pomegranate juice taste better is it illegal to order generic prednisone como comprar zoloft best place to order viagra online buy metformin 1000 mg generic reglan india cipro lawsuit attorneys lasix before bodybuilding show drug brand names in australia prevacid discounted why has zetia been discontinued minocycline tablets 50mg side effects lotrisone birth control online canada can you buy danazol over the counter pariet mg usa red viagra tablet buy toradol from canada suhagra on line purchase eldepryl tablets where to estrace drug sales data remedio alli onde comprar no brasil ordering buy cheap amantadine online prometrium discount medications where can i find terramycin cialis by cipla beconase aq pharmacy coupons what is the treatment for dilantin toxicity one guy one jar video wiki buy tetracycline uk methotrexate trade name india how long does children;s zyrtec take to work discount viagra on line generic trental us lowest price zestoretic cheap amoxil per pill all rights reserved kmart generic drug list 2011 how to use ciplactin and dexona where can i buy proair inhaler in kansas city eldepryl doctors online ordering provera online canada and neurontin best pharmacy to order avalide generic toradol for sale on line entocort user reviews coreg medication on line buy chloramphenicol mg online where can i get voveran sr pills purchase metformin canada where to viagra super active buy isoptin cheap arimidex bonus pills prilosec rx strength dosage for voltaren rapid 25 without script cheap altace aciclovir uses medication cost of neurontin without insurance buy amantadine mg online uk version of cymbalta purchase cialis soft mg meclizine pas cher mexican pharmacy no prescription alesse purchase ethionamide how long to take metformin for weight loss genuine buy generic bentyl cialis sublingual costco bactroban cream mupirocin calcium co diovan dose silagra 100 sildenafil citrate elavil results forum better than erexin-v buy ditropan greece best price generic imitrex vermox tablets side effects saw palmetto rx can order differin online purchase propranolol no prescription buy buspar 40 ortho tri-cyclen cost in canada order aciphex pills zyrtec syrup for babies med cab zocor dulcolax available over counter lioresal tablets for sale how much does exelon patch cost ordering kamagra viagra prescription amitriptyline free shipping half price brand viagra coming off risperdal medication is meclizine safe during pregnancy buy online 50mg clomid can i get cipro over the counter lexapro side effects forum sale parlodel safe baclofen buy order promethazine syrup online where can i buy spironolactone why is there a shortage of noroxin where do i buy methotrexate seroquel vs risperdal weight gain cheap online antivert order antivert buy genuine clonidine uk what is the classification for elocon brand topamax buy silagra 40 mg pharmacy buy prazosin in usa online retin-a 0,025 purchase montelukast sodium mechanism of action avalide generic usa maximum daily dosage of atarax celebrex and alcohol use elocon usa augmentin in italia buy betnovate online india glucotrol xl uk brand name best price for real vasotec effexor xr drugs brand old s reg year weight gain after coming off citalopram finax pills drugstore western drug benzac florida tenormin walgreens 24 hour pharmacy puerto rico abilify compulsive shopping actoplus met drugstore.com buy bystolic tablets online how to use extendaquin low price viagra pills where to get promethazine with codeine cough syrup buy livestock feed online nexium rx coupon cozaar comprare cabgolin delivery tenormin 25 mg price cafergot shortage 2012 kamagra oral jelly in croatia cheapest shuddha guggulu paypal trandate prescriptions best generic sinequan review where to buy elocon in canada safely cialis sublingual wanted online review viagra pas cher italie buy tetracycline online safe prescription paroxetine hcl er 12.5 mg phexin over counter is it illegal to order generic lynoral brahmi next day delivery hydrochlorothiazide from mylan medrol medication interactions vantin usa cvs prices how to get naprosyn on line viagra en ligne canada what is promethazine tablets used for precio de avodart en mexico voveran sr looking for albuterol tablets side effects wellbutrin xl side effects in men online pharmacy actonel can you buy xanax online no prescription better than speman generic finpecia for sale on line cost of lady era biaxin antibiotic shelf life cleocin where can i buy it viagra over the counter at walmart paroxetine online in uk canadian pharmacy duphalac is global pharmacy canada legitimate purchase digitalis without a prescription amitriptyline for insomnia reviews buy cheap prinivil how long does it take ditropan xl to start working amsterdam pharmacy night order albendazole online no prescription with a amex acquisto minocin sicuro online sumycin usa pharmacy valtrex online meds buy cytotec online pharmacy splitting topamax tablets non persciption nootropil digoxin tablets uses buy terramycin cheap grey leopard print air max 1 ebay chicken antibiotics for sale children;s allegra generic lisinopril drugs effects grifulvin v prices usa take tamoxifen pct zocor uk next day delivery ventolin cheap australia pharmacy order motilium online best site to buy zyloprim can buy epivir-hbv online advair generic canada how to take metformin medicine himplasia india adalat woldwide shipping fake cialis toronto canadian alliance of physiotherapy regulators (the alliance) no prescription retin-a 0,025 sale donde puedo comprar aleve renagel lawsuit diovan barato side effects of long term use of promethazine plendil canadian source the online drugstore aristocort can you order paxil zoloft india pharmacy generic name for roxithromycin quibron-t cheap price amaryl m 2 mg/1000 cost of acivir pills buy revia bulk donde comprar acai berry en argentina long term side effects of benemid can you get pregnant on cymbalta hyzaar daily dose buy evecare with no rx do you need a prescription to buy acyclovir on online effect of promethazine in pregnancy acquisto alli sicuro online ourcanadianpharmacy indian generics online endep pharcharmy generic hyzaar in usa phenergan cheap price cheapest brand viagra can you buy ventolin over the counter in new zealand prescription evista refills fucidin ointment dose order ampicillin online uk nikon 1 j1 generic trileptal cost viagra super active plus review pariet noprescrition needed canada online pharmacy viagra perth australia preciso de receita medica para comprar viagra can you get lukol casodex 50 mg tab methylprednisolone infusion rate folic acid and acidophilus for bv dosage overnight pharmacy buspar buy viagra sublingual bulk better than himcocid mail order generic diltiazem discount code for elavil prescription drug glucophage xr glucophage dosage pcos to buy venlor precose uk buy voltaren cream boots no prescription kamagra how to get kamagra oral jelly on line mirapex online order uk pharmacies online that sell suhagra buy minipress india online unique hoodia in canada doxycycline uses in cats prevacid buy online australia lozol overnight purchase hydrochlorothiazide in us cheap amoxicillin buy generic augmentin prilosec over the counter cost atarax over the counter drugs approved us pharmacy online benzac kamagra 100 chewable tabs prilosec uk equivalent effexor xr 150 mg canadian meds store legit online generic wellbutrin decadron 40 mg pharmacy cheap indian drugs actos comunicativos wikipedia most reliable place to buy hyzaar online claritin side effects prostate buy avapro 40 buy flomax without rx tadacip buy without without cheap buy altace cozaar order by phone how to import prilosec buy retin a gel 0.025 actos combinations current price strattera side effects of brand viagra luvox order in the us glucophage usa sale best pharmacy to order eldepryl suprax 400mg dose do men take clomiphene aldactone in usa buy clomid tablets online prescription rxp harm received content by conran accents how to import lotrisone cytotec legal us paroxetine where can i buy serevent online forum cheap viewing buy protonix online amazon trazodone mist canada can i get high on baclofen kamagra buy uk is prilosec better than generic omeprazole generic citalopram vs celexa side effects of risperdal abilify fast mexico levitra sale philippines cheapest brand minocycline for sale buy canada no prescription for etodolac cheap fertility drugs uk adverse effects of prednisone for dogs how to take innopran xl mg prescription drug assistance for plavix purchasing ceftin online generic brand for lasix cheap coversyl uk astelin maximum dosage what is digoxin medicine used for amlodipine besylate 5 mg tablet no prescription pulmicort respules generic generic l-tryptophan buy canada how does accutane work chemically tablet wisconsin pharmacy meds index rumalaya tablets side effects cialis online paypal suhagra 100mg cheep 4 life rx pharmacy best pharmacy technician online programs why does accutane stop working side effects of mixing zoloft and alcohol cabergoline national association of pharmacy regulatory authorities canada aleve tablets inactive ingredients prilosec doctors online the online drugstore serpina buy asacol 400 buy clavamox online no prescription order propranolol lowest price viagra 3-day delivery depakote er wiki adalat through mediation conciliation buy glucophage 10 provera indications usage what is prednisolone acetate for dogs priligy review forum purchase citalopram 40mg valtrex dosage for chicken pox generic floxin paypal keftab discontinued genuine kamagra cuanto sale fincar un cuarto viagra shop malaysia provera reviews side effects lotrisone medication himcocid online ordering prescription acticin buy cheap overnight vente de florinef au quebec over the counter asthma medication canada clonidine hcl 0.1 mg tab. side effects do you need rx rosuvastatin unisom groggy next day ordering ampicillin mexico allopurinol usa cvs prices tamoxifen vs raloxifene for breast cancer chemoprophylaxis alcohol and motrin 800 mg where to buy raloxifene without precription domperidone order best drugstore foundation for pale skin how to by endep online vermox prices usa antabuse medicine side effects generic vpxl switzerland what does ranitidine tablets look like levitra professional generic name kamagra chewable for men in usa what is chloramphenicol eye drops used for arthrotec side effects heart failure zentel suspension 20 ml diarex online legally comprar viagra plus pela internet pharmacy support team viagra cheap doxazosin no prescription how to get hydrochlorothiazide order levitra super active canada how to buy alli diet pills cheap ditropan dose urinary incontinence can you only get paroxetine on prescription clomid overnight 100mg can i make rosuvastatin baclofen tablets online use and action of adalat medication oxymorphone vs hydromorphone potency generic lexapro release date buy cephalexin 100mg online sarafem how to buy side effects of zestril 5mg where do i evista in usa side effects of alesse birth control para que sirve redustat 120 carbozyne with paypal payment zestril cost canadian clyde 1 gb experience alli diet aid pills generic viagra for sale online how to buy acai berry in india bystolic medication dose brand name ventolin online z pack antibiotic and pregnancy female viagra buy buy indocin 80 mg online where purchase renagel compazine supplier in uk buy elimite paypal vet-vipps accredited pharmacies clomid pills store nolvadex for sale u.s side effect of lasix furosemide real viagra from canada can i make toradol does costco sell propecia birth control pills actonel zovirax from usa pharmacy buy lanoxin from canada zyprexa medicine uses brand viagra online from usa purchase paroxetine in australia top 10 online medrol sites generic zyrtec overnite shipping spice india artane zantac rx dose actos doctors online prednisone treatment for lymphoma in dogs buying cymbalta cheap most effective male enhancement drug tadapox tadalafil and dapoxetine from rsm enterprises buy pulmicort hong kong without order paxil cr lawsuit settlement serophene delivery london grapefruit buspar medicine buy diakof online overnight can i buy benadryl in hong kong allegra online overnight buy cialis jelly pills metoclopramide 20 mg doxycycline shop prescription can you buy lisinopril online pharmacy order zyprexa price comparison med cab dilantin buy imitrex boots nitrofurantoin prescription only buying kamagra soft from canada no prescription is canadian drug store legitimate coumadin level too low femara best online non prescription pharmacy costco pharmacy seroflo price cialis online no prescriptions pictures of lisinopril tablets cheap keflex free delivery seroquel online overnight shipping albenza golf buy genuine zofran uk is relafen better than ibuprofen entocort enema package insert buy norfloxacin 400mg
PUBLIC LANDS FOR THE PEOPLE File Lawsuit Against SB 670 PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 16 November 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC LANDS FOR THE PEOPLE, INC., a California 501 C-3, non-profit corporation; Gerald E. Hobbs; Patrick Keene; Keene Engineering Co., Inc., a California corporation; Robert Haiduck; Terry Stapp; Dee Stapp; David DeCosta; James Gregory Lee; Mike Holt; Todd Bracken; Shannon Poe; and David Richard,

Plaintiffs,
v.

State of California; Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; California Department of Fish & Game; and Donald Koch, in his official capacity as Director, California Department of Fish & Game; and Does 1-20,

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
COMPLAINT FOR:

Adjudication of Federal Preemption and Supremacy Relating to the Mining Laws of the United States;
Deprivation of Property Rights and Due Process of Law; Denial of Equal Protection of the Laws; Taking of Property Without Compensation; Violation of Civil Rights; Violation of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, 30 U.S.C. § 21a; Violation of 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54 (Mining Act); Violation of Plaintiffs’ Implied Rights to Use Public Lands (Quiet Title); Unlawful Interference With Commerce; Injunctive Relief; and Damages.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because this action arises under the laws of the United States. The conduct complained of creates an actual, justiciable controversy. The California legislature has passed an act, SB 670, and the Governor of California, the Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed into law SB 670, prohibiting all motorized mining, including vacuum and suction dredge mining, in the rivers, streams, and waterways of California, in derogation of Federal law authorizing, protecting, and permitting such mining.
2. This Court has jurisdiction, among other matters, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question), §§ 2201, 2202 (declaratory relief), § 2202 (injunctive relief), and § 2409(a) (quiet title).
3. This action arises under the various acts, regulations, laws, and constitutions, as set forth in paragraph 8.
4. This Court has the power to grant declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
5. This lawsuit requests judicial review of final actions taken by the Defendants (or their predecessors-in-interest). Defendants’ actions unlawfully abrogate, prescribe, and/or prohibit Federal statutorily prescribed rights of unpatented mining claim owners, miners and prospectors as well as violating Federal statutorily prescribed methods relating to mining and prospecting on Federal lands in the State of California.
6. Defendants are attempting to unlawfully alter the entire Federal regulatory framework for citizens, miners and prospectors in the State of California by adopting a rigid, narrow, and single-focus policy regarding closure of all rivers, streams, and waterways to motorized mining methods, including without limitation, vacuum and suction dredge mining. Defendants failed to consider any meaningful alternatives which could be applied specifically to miners, prospectors, and other citizens who are potential miners and prospectors.
7. This is an action for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief (Rule 65, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), as well as for damages incurred by Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs request the Court to declare unlawful, enjoin implementation of, and set aside the promulgation and adoption by the legislature and the Governor of California of the prohibition of all motorized means of mining in the rivers, streams, and waterways of California, including without limitation, vacuum and suction dredge mining, not only as it applies to miners and prospectors, but also all other members of the public who are potential mining claimants, miners and prospectors.
8. The Plaintiffs seek an Order from this Court declaring that Defendants’ actions in adopting and implementing a prohibition of all motorized methods of mining, including without limitation, vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, and waterways of California as applied to miners and prospectors, and those who intend to become miners and prospectors, violated the following:
A. National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (1969); and Executive Orders: EO 12291 and EO 12866;
B. Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act (“MUSYA”), 16 U.S.C. § 528 et seq. (1960);
C. Numerous sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), as set forth in 36 CFR 228 et seq.; 36 CFR 261 et seq.; 43 CFR 3800; 43 CFR 3809.1 et seq., including without limitation 43 CFR 3809.3; and also including without limitation, numerous other sections of the CFRs regulating mining, prospecting, and associated activities on Federal lands.
D. The Federal Lands Policy and Management Act (“FLPMA”) 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., including without limitation §§ 1732(b), 1761 and 1769;
E. PL No. 104-208, 110 Stat.3009 § 108 (Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997);
F. 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54 (Mining Act), including without limitation the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, 30 U.S.C. § 21(a);
G. 16 U.S.C. § 481 (Use of Waters);
H. 30 U.S.C. § 612, 613, 615 (Multiple Surface Use Act);
I. 5 U.S.C. §§ 601, 602, 603(b) and © (Regulatory Flexibility Act As Amended By The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808) [SBREFA]);
J. The Endangered Species Act 16 U.S.C. § 1531;
K. California Civil Code § 3479 et seq.;
L. California Code of Civil Procedure § 731;
M. The 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States;
N. Article I § 8 (Commerce Clause) of the Constitution of the United States;
O. Article I § 7(a) of the Constitution of California; and
P. Article I § 19 of the Constitution of California.
9. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1391(b) and (e), and
because the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims occurred within this judicial district.

INTRODUCTION
10. This case presents a classic conflict between prospectors, miners who hold unpatented or patented mining claims on Federal lands pursuant to the mining laws of the United States, and the State of California, Department of Fish and Game (“DF&G”). Until recently, DF&G issued permits for vacuum and suction dredge prospecting and mining on such claims for rivers, streams, and waterways in the State of California running through such Federal mining claims and estates, and unclaimed Federal lands open to prospecting and mining.
11. Beginning on August 6, 2009, DF&G would no longer issue permits for vacuum and suction dredge mining on Federal mining claims, and cancelled all such permits previously issued. This had the effect of prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining and prospecting in the State of California on all Federal mining claims and lands, and unclaimed lands open to location and entry under the United States mining laws, and unlawfully prohibited the location, utilization and development of mining claims and mineral estates in California. This unlawfully affected and unconstitutionally burdened interstate and foreign commerce, since many of the prospectors, and mining claim and mineral estate owners, are non-residents of California who prospect or work their claims and mineral estates in California with vacuum and suction dredges. This affected not only California residents who are mining claim owners, prospectors and miners, but also non-resident mining claim owners, prospectors and miners who purchased non-resident permits from DF&G in order to engage in vacuum and suction dredge mining in the State of California. This also had the effect of stopping the sale of equipment and accessories for vacuum and suction dredge mining both within and without the State of California. This placed an unlawful, unconstitutional, and undue burden and restriction on interstate and foreign commerce in the sale of the aforesaid mining equipment and accessories.
12. The California DF&G claims authorization to issue permits for vacuum and suction dredge mining in the State of California, even when such mining occurs on Federal lands and is pursuant to the mining laws of the United States. California Fish and Game Code § 5653 et seq.; California Code of Regulations 14 CCR § 228. Waters within the boundaries of Federal lands, including National Forests, National Parks, and lands within the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) may be used for mining. 16 U.S.C. § 481. The attempt to stop suction dredge mining in California has a long and tangled history.
13. In 2004, the Karuk Tribe filed suit in the United States District Court in Oakland, California for declaratory and injunctive relief alleging improper management of suction dredge and other mining operations in waterways and riparian areas within the Klamath National Forest. The Karuk Tribe claimed violation of the National Forest Management Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and the Endangered Species Act. Judgment was rendered against the Karuk Tribe and for the defendants. Karuk Tribe of California vs. United States Forest Service, et al., 379 F.Supp.2d 1071 (2005). Anticipating a loss in Federal Court, the Karuk Tribe decided to try their legal luck in State Court. On May 6, 2005, the Karuk Tribe of California filed suit against the California Department of Fish and Game in the Superior Court of Alameda County. Karuk Tribe of California; and Leaf Hillman, Plaintiffs, v. California Department of Fish and Game; and Ryan Broddrick, Director, California Department of Fish and Game, Defendants, Case No. RG 05211597. The case was heard by Judge Bonnie Sabraw. Judge Sabraw is now retired, and the case was transferred to the Honorable Frank Roesch, Judge of the Superior Court, Alameda County. The object of this lawsuit was to stop all suction dredge mining in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, and specified tributaries, supposedly in order to protect Coho salmon. No notice was initially given to any miners that this litigation had been filed. The Karuk Tribe is headquartered on the Klamath River in Happy Camp, California.
14. The California Department of Fish and Game (“DF&G”) at first opposed the allegations of the Karuk Tribe as set forth in its Complaint. Soon however, DF&G decided to capitulate to the Karuk Tribe. DF&G, effective November 30, 2005, issued regulations severely restricting suction dredge mining in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers and their tributaries. These regulations specifically referenced the litigation brought by the Karuk Tribe in Alameda County. In addition, the Karuk Tribe and DF&G presented to Judge Sabraw a “Proposed Stipulated Judgment,” and later a modified “Proposed Stipulated Judgment,” which would have enjoined and restrained DF&G from issuing permits for suction dredge mining “for the Klamath, Salmon, and Scott Rivers, their tributaries and thermal refugia.”
15. The first that the miners heard of the State Court litigation filed by the Karuk Tribe in Alameda County was approximately December 7, 2005, when they were refused suction dredge mining permits by DF&G affecting the whole State of California, because of the Karuk Tribe litigation. At this stage, Judge Sabraw had issued no order authorizing such prohibition. DF&G did this without any rule making authority or process whatsoever, or in compliance with any court order.
16. The mining claim owners and miners who were denied permits by DF&G contacted Mr. Hobbs, as President of PLP, and informed him of their situation. Mr. Hobbs informed other mining groups of the Karuk Tribe litigation, and the unilateral and unauthorized prohibitions placed on suction dredge mining in California by DF&G. Mr. Hobbs requested the Court not to sign the Proposed Stipulated Judgment (“PSJ”). In 2006, Mr. Hobbs, and another mining organization, were allowed by Judge Sabraw to intervene in the Karuk Tribe litigation. Mr. Hobbs immediately set about opposing the PSJ which the Karuk Tribe and DF&G had presented to Judge Sabraw.
17. After extensive briefings and hearings by all parties, on June 16, 2006, Judge Sabraw issued the Court’s “Order Denying Motion to Enter Judgment.” Judge Sabraw specifically found that the PSJ which would have prohibited suction dredge mining in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, and their tributaries, “was contrary to law and public policy.”
18. DF&G initially opposed the Karuk Tribe in the litigation before Judge Sabraw. However, DF&G has openly admitted that it does not want to be the agency administering suction dredge mining in California. Seeing an opportunity to rid itself of issuing permits for suction dredge mining, DF&G decided to switch horses in mid-stream.
19. Thereafter, DF&G changed its position and filed two affidavits from its officials and employees asserting that suction dredge mining could have an adverse effect on Coho Salmon in the litigation relating to the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers. The miners strongly disputed any such alleged admissions of DF&G.
20. No miner in California would ever rely on DF&G to protect his or her interest. The mining community in California has no confidence in DF&G to protect their interest in anything relating to mining.
21. Judge Sabraw encouraged all parties to enter into settlement negotiations. After two meetings in Sacramento, and much blood, sweat, and tears, all parties were finally able to reach settlement of the Karuk Tribe litigation. On December 20, 2006, Judge Sabraw entered the Court’s Order and Consent Judgment. The heart of the Court’s December 20, 2006, Order and Consent Judgment was that DF&G will conduct a review relating to the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq., which was to be completed within 18 months. During this period, suction dredge mining was to be permitted in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, and their tributaries. All requests for injunctive relief against DF&G barring suction dredge mining were withdrawn pending such environmental review. Thus, suction dredge mining continued pending an environmental determination as to whether any prohibition whatsoever would be justified.
22. The heart of Judge Sabraw’s Order and Consent Judgment reads as follows:
“THEREFORE, the Department is hereby ORDERED to conduct a further environmental review pursuant to CEQA of its suction dredge mining regulations and to implement, if necessary, via rulemaking, mitigation measures to protect the Coho salmon and/or other special status fish species in the watershed of the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, listed as threatened or endangered after the 1994 EIR.”

23. The aforesaid review was to be completed within eighteen months, and the Court retained jurisdiction of the matter. DF&G was not able to complete the review in the time frame set by Judge Sabraw, claiming (a) that they could not do an EIR limited to only the Klamath, Scott and Salmon Rivers, but had to do an all inclusive statewide EIR; and (b) further claiming that the California financial crisis prevented it from being funded by the legislature to complete the DF&G unilaterally expanded statewide review. There is now pending a hearing before Judge Roesch to hold DF&G and its Director, Donald Koch, in contempt for failing to timely complete the DF&G inspired statewide review.
24. The two suspect affidavits filed by DF&G turned out to cost the State $230,000.00. The Karuk Tribe later filed a motion for attorneys fees against DF&G, who, after negotiations, agreed to and did pay the Karuk Tribe $230,000.00. The Karuk Tribe agreed to seek no further attorneys fees in the litigation before Judge Sabraw.
25. Although the Karuk Tribe consented to the judgment entered by Judge Sabraw on December 20, 2006, the Karuk Tribe then became an initiator and supporter of new legislation, AB 1032, which supposedly was meant to protect trout by prohibiting suction dredge gold mining in approximately sixty-eight rivers throughout California, including the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers. AB 1032 was unusual in referring numerous times to the Karuk Tribe litigation in Alameda County, still then pending before Judge Sabraw. AB 1032 by its terms was to remain in effect until January 1, 2011, unless DF&G has completed the CEQA environmental review prior to that date which has been mandated by Judge Sabraw in the Karuk Tribe litigation in Alameda County. Thus, the heart of AB 1032 was to prohibit suction dredge gold mining in sixty-eight rivers throughout California, including the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, and their tributaries, until the CEQA environmental review is completed. This stood Judge Sabraw’s December 20, 2006, Order and Consent Judgment on its head.
26. Judge Sabraw refused to prohibit any such suction dredge mining, including gold mining, until the environmental review was completed. The environmental review had to be completed first in order to see whether or not any such prohibition would be justified. Even in the unlikely event an environmental review would justify suction dredge mining prohibitions in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers; any such prohibition set forth in AB 1032 would be immediately repealed upon the completion of the environmental review ordered by Judge Sabraw. AB 1032 was inherently illogical, since it applied only to suction dredge gold mining, and allowed all other types of suction dredge mining, including mining for silver, copper, lead,
mercury, and other heavy metals and precious and semi-precious gems. However, AB 1032’s inherently illogical provisions were not its chief fault and defect.
27. AB 1032 was meant to subvert Judge Sabraw’s court order permitting suction dredge mining, including gold mining, in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers pending an environmental review. AB 1032 was special, private, legislation that enhanced the Karuk Tribe’s economic and political position in a way that Judge Sabraw, after hearings and consideration, refused to sanction.
28. Plaintiff Gerald E. Hobbs testified before the legislature against the passage of AB 1032. However, AB 1032 was eventually passed and went to Governor Schwarzenegger for his signature. What AB 1032 was meant to do is make Governor Schwarzenegger a party to the subversion of a valid court order. AB 1032 struck at the very heart of a court’s authority to uphold the rule of law. Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 1032.
29. In his veto message, Governor Schwarzenegger stated:
“I am returning Assembly Bill 1032 without my signature. The purpose of this bill is to protect fish and wildlife from the potential deleterious effects of suction dredge mining. Although I appreciate the author’s intent and the need to protect our fish, wildlife, and water resources, this bill is unnecessary. Current law gives the Department of Fish and Game (Department) the necessary authority to protect fish and wildlife resources from suction dredge mining. It has promulgated regulations and issues permits for this activity. Permits for suction dredge mining must ensure that these operations are not deleterious to fish and allow the Department to specify the type and size of equipment to be used. In its regulations, the Department may also designate specific waters or areas that are closed to dredging. It is unclear why this bill specifically targets a number of specific waterways for closure or further restrictions. The listed waterways represent only a small fraction of the waters in our State where suction dredging is occurring. The benefit or protection from such a minor closure is negligible and supports the notion that scientific environmental review should precede such decisions.”

30. After Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 1032, legislative allies of the Karuk Tribe then attempted to stop suction dredge mining in California by attaching a prohibition of such mining to the California state budget bill. Governor Schwarzenegger line-item vetoed that attempt.
31. After the stealth attack on suction dredge mining via the state budget failed, the Karuk Tribe then petitioned the Department of Fish & Game to have suction dredge mining prohibited throughout California. DF&G rejected the Karuk Tribe’s petition.
32. This did not stop the Karuk Tribe’s longstanding attempt to end suction dredge mining in California. On February 5, 2009, three members and officials of the Karuk Tribe filed a purported taxpayers action in the Alameda County Superior Court seeking to stop suction dredge mining throughout all of California. Hillman et al. v. California Department of Fish and Game. Case No. RG009 434444. That case was eventually assigned to Judge Roesch, in light of his involvement with the prior Karuk Tribe litigation upon the retirement of Judge Sabraw.
33. After pointing out to the Court that the supposed outraged taxpayer Plaintiffs were really stand-ins for the Karuk Tribe, an amended Complaint was filed consisting of the Karuk Tribe, its three initial members, and a bevy of environmental groups and allies of the Karuk Tribe.
34. The same relief the Karuk Tribe sought in the taxpayer suit, Hillman v. DF&G, supra, could have been brought in the initial case heard by Judge Sabraw, Karuk Tribe v. DF&G, supra. That case is still subject to the Superior Court’s jurisdiction. However, since no further attorneys fees could be obtained in Karuk Tribe v. DF&G, a supposed taxpayers’ suit was initiated with the hope of obtaining further attorney’s fees. The State is concerned that in light of the Preliminary Injunction issued by Judge Roesch, they will be subject to further substantial attorney’s fees.
35. The Karuk Tribe then sought a Preliminary Injunction in the taxpayers’ action before Judge Roesch. On July 10, 2009, Judge Roesch issued a Preliminary Injunction, relying on the two suspect affidavits filed by officials and employees of DF&G relating to Coho salmon in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers in the litigation initiated before Judge Sabraw.
36. The Preliminary Injunction ordered by Judge Roesch prohibited the California Department of Fish and Game from issuing any permits for suction dredge mining in every river, stream, and waterway throughout California. Judge Roesch’s Preliminary Injunction applied to every river, stream, and waterway in California irrespective of whether or not they had any Coho salmon in them or indeed any fish at all. Only a small percentage of the rivers, streams, and waterways in California have any salmon in them whatsoever, and a substantially smaller percentage contain any Coho salmon. The Preliminary Injunction ordered by Judge Roesch is presently on appeal.
37. On February 27, 2009, another attempt was made by the Karuk Tribe to circumvent Judge Sabraw’s Order. Allies of the Karuk Tribe introduced SB 670 in the State Senate again seeking to prohibit all suction dredge mining in every river, stream, lake, and waterway in California until a CEQA review had been completed and new regulations were operative. The prohibition would take place whether or not there were Coho salmon, trout, minnows, or any fish whatsoever in any of the State’s waters. SB 670 was, in many respects, a replay of AB 1032.
38. SB 670 was aimed at suction dredge mining, and prohibited the issuance by DF&G of any new permits for suction dredge mining in California. In addition, SB 670 invalidated any prior permits issued by DF&G for suction dredge mining. SB 670 prohibited suction dredge mining in every river, stream, lake, and waterway throughout the State of California, not just the three rivers in the initial suit brought before Judge Sabraw--the Klamath, Scott and Salmon Rivers--nor the 68 rivers and streams targeted in AB 1032. This prohibitory progression is regulation run riot.
39. SB 670 passed the legislature and was sent to Governor Schwarzenegger for his signature. Reversing his position where he vetoed AB 1032, and the attempt to prohibit suction dredge mining through a rider to the state budget. Governor Schwarzenegger signed SB 670 into law. This constituted a triumph of money and raw political power over the laws of the United States, including without limitation, those laws relating to mining on Federal lands.
40. For Plaintiff Public Lands for the People, Inc. (“PLP”), and its members as well as all other Plaintiffs, suction dredge prospecting and mining in the rivers, streams, and waterways of California is not recreational. It is an important economic endeavor that has a direct economic impact on family finances, business finances, and in these hard economic times, often is the difference between having to choose whether to put gas in the car, or buy food or medicine for the family. For PLP and its members, and all other Plaintiffs, suction dredge prospecting and mining is not merely a question of having “fun”. Prohibiting suction dredge mining to prospectors and miners, who are Federal mineral estate grantees, forces them to face serious economic hardship. With a perilous economy, being able to sell even an ounce of gold for over $900.00 makes a substantial difference as to the economic choices a family has regarding basic necessities.
41. Prospecting, placer mining, suction dredge mining, and granted rights of way associated with mining and prospecting activities, all of which are mining operations pursuant to the mining laws and the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), and all of which have valid pre-existing rights pursuant to the mining laws and CFRs, are traditionally common in the State of California, and done in accordance with the rules and customs of miners. Suction dredge mining is the only reasonable, economical, and environmentally sound method for extracting precious metals from the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways in California.
42. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that prohibition of vacuum and suction dredge mining has already taken place and is being implemented. DF&G has sent letters to holders of permits validly issued prior to the passage of SB 670 telling them to cease and desist all suction dredge mining in California. DF&G will no longer issue permits for suction dredge mining in California.
43. This has direct and immediate effect upon mining claim owners, prospectors and miners in California, in that they need mechanized methods of mining, including vacuum and suction dredge mining, in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California in order to economically prospect and mine in those rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways, and to engage in other associated mining activities therein. DF&G asserts that permits are needed in order to engage in vacuum or suction dredge mining anywhere in the State of California, whether such mining occurs on private, State, or Federal lands, or pursuant to mining claims authorized by the State of California or the United States, or authorized in any manner whatsoever.
44. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that the prohibition of vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California will affect over ninety-five percent (95%) of all mineral production from the aforesaid rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways.
45. The legislature did not consider any alternatives to the prohibition of all motorized means of mining, including vacuum and suction dredge mining, in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California.


SB 670
46. SB 670 adds to the CF&GC a newly enacted Section 5653.1.
47. Present law prohibits the use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment by any person in any river, stream, or lake in California without a permit issued by DF&G. California Fish and Game Code § 5653 (“CF&GC”). On average, DF&G has issued approximately 3,200 suction dredge mining permits to California residents every year for the last fifteen (15) years. It is estimated that suction dredge miners, resident and non-resident, spend approximately $60,000,000 in the rural counties of California on supplies, fuel, food, camping, equipment, hardware, lodging, goods and services. Any person required to possess a permit pursuant to Section 5653, shall present his or her dredging equipment for inspection upon request of a State or County Fish and Game Warden. CF&GC § 5653.3. For purposes of §§ 5653 and 5653.3, “person” does not include a partnership, corporation, or other type of association. Under existing law, it is unlawful to possess a vacuum or suction dredge in areas, or in or within a hundred yards of waters that are closed to the use of vacuum or suction dredges. A violation of the permit requirement is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000.00 and six months in jail. CF&GC § 5653 et seq.; 14 CCR § 228 et seq. The Plaintiffs, as well as other miners and prospectors, are concerned that they will be cited for a criminal violation by DF&G should they attempt to engage in vacuum or suction dredge mining, as well as any other motorized mining use.
48. DF&G is authorized to close areas otherwise open for dredging and for which permits have been issued, if there is an unanticipated water level change and the department determines that the closure is necessary to protect wildlife and water resources. 14 CCR § 228. No such determination has been made by DF&G as it relates to SB 670.
49. Existing law requires DF&G to adopt regulations to implement certain of the vacuum and suction dredge equipment requirements, and authorizes the DF&G to issue regulations with respect to other requirements. Existing law requires that the regulations be adopted in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. CF&GC § 5653.9.
50. CEQA requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a “project”, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. SB 670 declares that the issuance of permits to operate vacuum or suction dredge equipment is a “project” pursuant to CEQA. CF&GC § 5653.1(a).
51. The act exempts from its provisions, among other things, certain types of ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, and emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service. CF&GC § 21080(b)(1); 14 CCR § 15060©(1). The issuance of permits for vacuum or suction dredge mining authorized by Federal law is a non-discretionary and ministerial act.
52. After SB 670 designated the issuance of permits to operate vacuum or suction dredge equipment to be a “project” under CEQA, it suspended the issuance of permits, including permits issued prior to the passage of SB 670, and any mining pursuant to such permit, until the DF&G has completed an environmental impact report for the “project” as ordered by the Court in Karuk Tribe et al. v. California Department of Fish and Game, et al., Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG 05211597. DF&G has stated that it will not complete the Court ordered environmental review of its permitting program until, at the earliest, in the late summer of 2011.
53. SB 670 prohibits the use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment in any river, stream, or lake, for in-stream mining purposes, until the director of DF&G certifies to the Secretary of State that: 1) The DF&G has completed the environmental review of its existing vacuum or suction dredging regulations as ordered by the Court; 2) DF&G has transmitted for filing with the Secretary of State, a certified copy of new regulations as necessary; and 3) the new regulations are operative. There is no time frame set for this cascade of contingencies, and there is no realistic expectation that they will ever be completed within the next decade, if then.
54. In trying to explain why the completion of the environmental impact report will take so long, DF&G has stated that:
“Q: When will the EIR be completed? DFG is preparing a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to conduct the court-ordered review. DFG estimates at this point that it will complete and certify the Subsequent EIR (and updates to the existing regulations, if necessary) after a series of public meetings and other opportunities for public comment and review by late summer 2011. The environmental review and regulation processes are governed by the California Environmental Quality Act and the Administrative Procedures Act, respectively. The time line is driven by the requirements of these laws.”

“Q: Why is this process going to take so long? DFG has already begun the environmental review necessary to analyze the current regulations; this was last done in 1994. The review process will be complex and lengthy given the statewide scope of the analysis and the time that has passed since the last review. In addition to the detailed written analysis prepared by DFG in coordination with the State Water Board, the review process will also include several opportunities for public involvement, both via public meetings and through solicitation of written comments and suggestions. Initial public meetings to discuss the scope of the environmental analysis are currently being planned for November 2009 in Fresno, Sacramento and Redding. Additional details, including the time and place of the meetings, will be posted on the DFG Web site, www.dfg.ca.gov, as they become available.”

Although the court-ordered review for the EIR is only for the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, DF&G will conduct a statewide review for the EIR. DF&G has stated that:
“Based on the information DFG collected from interested parties, DFG informed the Alameda County Superior Court in early 2008 that DFG could not proceed with the court-ordered environmental review in reliance on an addendum to the 1994 EIR. DFG informed the court at the same time that more than minor additions or changes to the 1994 EIR would be necessary and that statewide issues would need to be addressed in a subsequent environmental document in order to fulfill DFG’s obligations under CEQA. As a result, DFG informed the Alameda County Superior Court that it intended to prepare a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report that would be statewide in scope to comply with the December 2006 Court Order.”

55. SB 670 is declared to be an “urgency statute,” and without support of any credible evidence whatsoever, and without the completion of any environmental impact report the legislature:
“finds that suction or vacuum dredge mining results in various adverse environmental impacts to protected fish species, the water quality of this state, and the health of the people of this state, and, in order to protect the environment and the people of California pending the completion of a court-ordered environmental review by the Department of Fish and Game and the operation of new regulations, as necessary, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.”

56. Thus, the legislative finding is dependent upon the completion of an environmental impact review (“EIR”) that is yet to take place, and may never take place. If an EIR ever does take place, it will most likely affirm that not one fish has ever been killed or harmed through present day suction dredge mining; that such mining causes no discernable harm to the natural environment of the water resources of the State of California; and is, in fact, beneficial to the environment and natural resources of the State of California. The purported legislative finding is without basis in fact, and is a political, not a scientific conclusion, and is contrary to the scientific evidence that was available to the legislature.
57. DF&G will not issue refunds for those who have purchased permits prior to the passage of SB 670, since SB 670 does not provide for any such refunds.
58. DF&G has stated that vacuum or suction dredge equipment lawfully placed in the waters of California prior to the passage of SB 670 must be immediately removed pursuant to CF&GC § 5563. No compensation is to be provided by the DF&G or SB 670 to any mining claim owner, miner or prospector for the expense of purchasing such equipment, lawfully placing such equipment in the State’s waters, or having to remove such equipment from the waters.


PARTIES
59. Plaintiff Public Lands for the People, Inc. is a California 501 c-3 non-profit corporation (“PLP”). PLP is a nationwide organization of miners, who are mineral estate grantees, and prospectors. With its constituent members, PLP constitutes approximately 40,000 people. Its founder and President is Gerald E. Hobbs of San Bernardino, California. PLP, has among its membership, miners and prospectors with mining claims and estates in National Forests in California, Federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management in California, National Parks in California, and other Federal lands in California, and throughout the United States. Large numbers of the membership of PLP receive yearly permits from DF&G to engage in vacuum or suction dredge mining in California, and do so engage in such mining in California. These PLP members are directly affected in their mining, prospecting and associated operations by passage of SB 670 that prohibits the issuance of permits for vacuum and suction dredge mining by DF&G, and the cancellation by DF&G of permits already issued, for vacuum and suction dredge mining in California. These PLP members are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
60. Gerald E. Hobbs is a member of, founder, and President of PLP. Mr. Hobbs has mining claims and mineral estates in three National Forests, all of which are in California. They are Angeles National Forest, Tahoe National Forest, and Six Rivers National Forest. Mr. Hobbs has permits from DF&G to engage in vacuum and suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Hobbs has paid DF&G for these permits. These permits are subject to cancellation, and have been cancelled, by DF&G pursuant to SB 670. Mr. Hobbs has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Mr. Hobbs earned income from suction dredge mining in California which was necessary to maintain his economic viability. Mr. Hobbs is directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
61. Patrick Keene is part of a third generation family-owned business that has been serving the mining community in California, the United States, and throughout the world for the past 60 years. Mr. Keene is Secretary/Treasurer of Keene Engineering Co., Inc. (“Keene Engineering”) of Chatsworth, California. Keene Engineering is the largest supplier of small scale dredging and mining equipment in the world. The Company, as well as many other manufacturers, sells to small businesses and dealers who provide equipment to prospectors and miners throughout California and the United States. Many of the people who operate suction dredges come to visit California to dredge for gold and work their mining claims. While doing so, they support local businesses in the process of filling their other needs. Mr. Keene has been working for Keene Engineering for over 30 years. Mr. Keene is a member of PLP. Mr. Keene and Keene Engineering are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
62. The economic impact of the prohibition of suction dredge mining in California is devastating to Keene Engineering. Since the majority of Keene Engineering’s business is in California, it would not allow the Company and the many others small businesses who also sell prospecting and mining equipment or supplies, to survive. Much of Keene Engineering’s business relies on California suction dredge miners. The losses involved with Keene Engineering’s business would be in the many millions of dollars.
63. Since the introduction of SB 670, suction dredge sales by Keene Engineering and its California dealers have stopped. The fear of this activity becoming illegal, and it being a misdemeanor, carrying up to $1,000.00 in fines, and six months in jail, has been devastating to Keene Engineering’s business, as well as its dealers.
64. Forty percent of Keene Engineering’s business is based on equipment sold to small and medium scale suction dredge miners in California, and the people who travel from other states to suction dredge mine in the rivers and streams in California. Thousands of those people also enjoy associated tourism in California and support local seasonal businesses.
65. Most of Keene Engineering’s suppliers, who provided it with components to build suction dredges are profoundly impacted as well. These businesses also have had a substantial drop in their business. The passage of SB 670 has created a ripple effect on many other industries both in and out of the State of California adversely affecting interstate commerce. SB 670’s prohibition on vacuum and suction dredge mining has cost, or will cost, California economic damage in an amount of approximately 60 million dollars a year, and possibly much more.
66. SB 670 will put Keene Engineering out of business. Keene Engineering employs 35 workers. Keene Engineering will lay off approximately 12 employees in an attempt to economically survive. A number of Keene Engineering’s dealers have contacted the Company, and told Keene Engineering that they are closing their doors since they cannot economically survive selling just non-motorized equipment such as sluice boxes and gold pans.
67. The suction dredge community supports many other businesses in gold bearing areas which are in danger of economic failure. Many jobs are being lost due to the loss of tourism that the passage of SB 670 has engendered. Many campgrounds are empty along rivers and mining areas across California. Many businesses are seasonal, including campgrounds, hotels, restaurants, service stations, and grocery stores. Many of these businesses are located in severely economically depressed areas. These business owners rely on small scale suction dredge miners, prospectors, and tourism in order to survive economically. Many of the counties in Northern California, in the gold bearing area, are economically depressed and having very hard economic times. SB 670 is adding to this economic suffering, eliminating jobs, and creating a loss of tax base for these areas and for the State of California.
68. Californians, and people who come from other states to visit California, spend an average of $3,200.00 per month in local economies as of a study made in 1994. In 2009, the amount spent is substantially higher. Californians, and people from other states, purchase special vehicles such as trucks, campers, trailers, quads, and recreational vehicles to prospect and mine for gold in California.
69. Since the passage of SB 670, many mining claim and mineral estates will lose considerable value because their claim owners cannot mine them effectively, and the counties where they are situated will be compelled to reassess the value of their claims. This will create a large loss to County and State tax basis, and will ultimately curtail governmental services.
70. Mr. Keene is also a small scale independent miner who owns mining claims and estates throughout California. Mr. Keene’s mining claims are on Federal land in National Forests in California and on Bureau of Land Management land in California. Mr. Keene engages in vacuum and suction dredge mining in California, and has permits from DF&G allowing him to engage in such mining. Mr. Keene has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Keene has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Mr. Keene supplements his and his family’s income from being able to engage in suction dredge mining. By not being able to engage in suction dredge mining on Federal land in California, Mr. Keene, in his individual capacity, is directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
71. Robert Haiduck is a prospector and miner with mining claims and mineral estates in the Sequoia National Forest, Trinity National Forest, Cleveland National Forest, and other National Forests in California. Mr. Haiduck also has mining claims on federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). Mr. Haiduck is a member of PLP. Mr. Haiduck engages in suction dredge mining on his mining claims in the National Forests in California, as well as, his mining claims on lands administered by BLM. No waters where Mr. Haiduck has mining claims contain any salmon of any species whatsoever. Pursuant to BLM regulations, every ten (10) acres of his unpatented mining claims on BLM land must be sampled for mineral values. Since these claims are on the water, they have to be suction dredged to be correctly and legally sampled. Mr. Haiduck has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Haiduck has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Haiduck has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Haiduck is severely ill. He is financially dependent for the support of himself and his family, which includes three (3) small children, on suction dredge mining on his mining claims in the National Forests and on BLM land in California. Mr. Haiduck and his family have substantial amounts of personal money invested in mining claims that can only be worked feasibly, economically, and in an environmentally friendly manner by suction dredge mining. Without the ability to suction dredge mine Mr. Haiduck and his family stand to lose almost all of their money, and be completely wiped out economically. Being unable to engage in suction dredge mining on his mining claims in the National Forests of California, and BLM land in California, causes immediate and substantial financial harm to Mr. Haiduck and his family. Mr. Haiduck is directly, severely and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
72. Terry Stapp is a 60% disabled Vietnam veteran who retired in 1991 after 25 years in the United States Air Force. Mr. Stapp is a suction dredge miner and has so mined on Federal land in the Downieville area in Sierra County, California for over 30 years. His mining claims and estates in Sierra County are worthless without the ability to engage in suction dredge mining. The economic loss to Mr. Stapp and his wife, Dee, is devastating. Mr. Stapp supplemented his income by suction dredge mining while he was on active duty in the United States Air Force. Since Mr. Stapp retired from the Air Force, suction dredge mining in California is his sole source of income, other than his military retirement pension. Mr. Stapp is directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
73. Dee Stapp is the wife of Terry Stapp. Mrs. Stapp is a member of PLP. Mrs. Stapp has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California. Mrs. Stapp engages in suction dredge mining on her claims in California, and has permits from DF&G to engage in such mining. Mrs. Stapp has paid DF&G for these permits. Mrs. Stapp has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Mrs. Stapp supplements her and her husband’s income through suction dredge mining in California. Mrs. Stapp is directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
74. Mrs. Stapp started a gold prospecting store in San Bernardino, California and has run it since August 1, 1978. Mrs. Stapp sells suction dredges and dredge accessories to miners which represent about 60% of the store’s income. The passage of SB 670 is a devastating economic blow to Mrs. Stapp’s business income. SB 670 has placed in question the economic
viability of Mrs. Stapp’s business, and the ability of her store to remain open.
75. Mrs. Stapp sells the gold she and her husband obtain from suction dredge mining through the Internet throughout the United States and in foreign commerce. The inability to suction dredge mine will substantially impact the Stapps’ financial and economic well-being, since the Internet sales of suction dredge mined gold amounts to many thousands of dollars per year, and is a necessity for the Stapps to financially survive.
76. David DeCosta has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 20 years. Mr. DeCosta is a member of PLP. Mr. DeCosta has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California. Mr. DeCosta has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. DeCosta has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. DeCosta has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. DeCosta and his family. Mr. DeCosta and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
77. James Gregory Lee has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 40 years. Mr. Lee is partially disabled. Mr. Lee is a member of PLP. Mr. Lee has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California. Mr. Lee has permits from DF&G, including an assistant suction dredge permit for an aide to help him operate his suction dredge, due to his disability, in order to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Lee has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Lee has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. Lee and his family. Mr. Lee and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
78. Mike Holt has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 24 years. Mr. Holt is a member of PLP. Mr. Holt has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California in the Tahoe National Forest. Mr. Holt has also engaged in suction dredge mining on private properties, for which he needs permits from DF&G. Mr. Holt has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Holt has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Holt has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided the main source of income for Mr. Holt and his family. Suction dredge mining has allowed Mr. Holt to support his wife and four children, and in these difficult economic times, to continue to help out his children economically. Mr. Holt and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
79. Todd Bracken has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 15 years. Mr. Bracken has been awarded a Certificate of Recognition by the California State Assembly for his mining activities on his family’s historic mining claims, and his use and popularization of California gold throughout the world in his artistic creations. Mr. Bracken is a member of PLP. Mr. Bracken has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California on the Yuba River. Mr. Bracken has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Bracken has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Bracken has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. Bracken and his family. Mr. Bracken takes much of the gold he obtains from suction dredge mining and uses it to make fine jewelry. Mr. Bracken sells that jewelry throughout the United States and in foreign commerce. This involves many thousands of dollars in sales per year. Mr. Bracken maintains a website advertising his jewelry for sale. That website states that Mr. Bracken sells natural California gold jewelry. California gold commands a higher price in the market place because of its natural purity and the history of gold mining associated with California. The prohibition of suction dredge mining in California dramatically and drastically affects Mr. Bracken’s mining and jewelry business, and its economic viability. Mr. Bracken and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
80. Shannon Poe is suction dredge miner in California. Mr. Poe is a member of PLP. Mr. Poe has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California, including National Forest and Bureau of Land Management lands in California. Mr. Poe has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Poe has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Poe has spent over $27,000.00 since January 1, 2009 in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. Poe and his family. Mr. Poe and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
81. David Richard has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 20 years. Mr. Richard is a member of PLP. Mr. Richard has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California. Mr. Richard has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Richard has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Richard has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. Richard and his family. Mr. Richard and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
82. Defendant State of California is a State of the United States, one of whose agencies is the California Department of Fish and Game (“DF&G”).
83. Defendant Arnold Schwarzenegger is the Governor of the State of California, and is sued in his official capacity as Governor.
84. The California Department of Fish and Game is a department of the Executive Branch of the State of California, and among its other duties, is responsible for the issuing of permits for vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within California.
85. Defendant Donald Koch is Director of the California Department of Fish and Game, and is sued in his official capacity as Director of the aforesaid Department.
86. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants DOE 1 through DOE 20 are unknown to Plaintiffs at this time, who therefore sue said Defendants by such fictitious names and will ask leave of Court to amend this Complaint to show their true names and capacities when the same are ascertained. Said Defendants are sued as principals and/or agents, servants, and employees of said principals, and all of the acts performed by them as agents, servants, and employees were performed within the course and scope of their authority and employment. Each of the Defendants is in some way responsible for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiffs.
87. At all times herein, all named Defendants and Defendants DOES 1 though 20 inclusive, and each of them, were the agents and employees of each of the remaining Defendants and were at all times acting within the purpose and scope of said agency and employment and each Defendant ratified and approved the acts of its agent.


CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
COUNT I: Preemption and the Supremacy Clauses
88. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 87 of this Complaint.
89. The heaviest concentrations of placer gold and other valuable minerals on unpatented mining claims held under Federal law, and on unclaimed Federal lands open to mining, are in waterways where a natural concentration of gold and other valuable minerals is in the gravels and on or near the bedrock of the riverbed or streambed. The only viable, economic and environmentally sound manner to recover the placer gold under these conditions is through use of a suction dredge. Suction dredge mining is the highest and best use for placer mining claims. Miners and prospectors have a federally granted right to use such waters in order to develop their mining claims and mineral estates. 16 U.S.C. § 481 (Use of Waters). All state laws, or regulations, in conflict with this right, are void and of no effect. 43 CFR § 3809.3.
90. Miners and prospectors have a statutory right, not a privilege, to go upon open Federal public domain lands for mineral prospecting, exploration, and development. Administrators may not unreasonably restrict the exercise of that right. The Federal Mining Law of 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. § 21 et seq.), provides that all valuable mineral deposits in lands belonging to the United States shall be free and open to exploration and development. The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2, further provides that “the laws of the United States . . . shall be the supreme law of the land . . . with anything in the laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding”. Article IV, § 3, of the United States Constitution, provides that “Congress shall have the power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States.” The absolute prohibition of SB 670 of vacuum or suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways for Federal mining claims within Federal lands in the State of California, directly conflicts with those Federal mining laws, and violates the Supremacy Clause and Article IV, § 3, of the United States Constitution.
91. Plaintiffs are entitled to secure the necessary permits to conduct vacuum or suction dredge mining operations on Federal lands, and the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within those Federal lands, pursuant to, and including, without limitation, the Mining Acts of 1866 and 1870, the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, 30 U.S.C. § 21a.; the Federal Mining Law of 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. § 21 et seq.); 16 U.S.C. § 481, (Use of Waters); the Stock Raising Homestead Act of 1916 (Ch. 9, 39 Stat. 862, codified at 43 U.S.C. § (1976); the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (“FLPMA”) 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., including without limitation §§ 1732(b), 1761 and 1769; the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”); 16 U.S.C. § 1600 et seq. (1976); Multiple Surface Use Sustained Yield Act (“MUSYA”); 16 U.S.C. § 528 et seq. (1960); Multiple Surface Use Act, 30 U.S.C. §§ 612, 613, 615; Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132; 5 U.S.C. §§ 601, 602, 603(b), Regulatory Flexibility Act As Amended By The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996; 5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808) [SBREFA]; the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.); and numerous sections of the Code of Regulations (“CFR”), including without limitation, 36 CFR 228 et seq.; 36 CFR 261 et seq.; 43 CFR § 3800; 43 CFR § 3809.1 et seq., including without limitation, 43 CFR § 3809.3. Thus, SB 670’s absolute prohibition of vacuum or suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within those Federal lands violates Plaintiffs’ rights pursuant to the aforesaid statutes, rules, and regulations mandated by Congress.
92. SB 670 is prohibitory, not regulatory, in its fundamental character. It strikes at the central purpose and objectives of the applicable Federal law regarding mining. Through SB 670, the State of California attempts to substitute its political judgment for that of Congress. The Federal government has authorized a specific use of Federal lands for mining, and California cannot prohibit that use either temporarily or permanently.
93. Vacuum and suction dredge mining is the only practical way any of the Plaintiffs can economically mine the valuable mineral deposits located in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within Federal lands in California. SB 670 is a de facto prohibition on all such mining. To the extent DF&G may issue permits, plaintiffs are entitled to secure the necessary permits to conduct vacuum and suction dredge mining operations on Federal and non-Federal lands within the State of California pursuant to, and including without limitation, the above-stated statutes and regulations. Thus, SB 670’s absolute prohibition of vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within Federal and non-Federal lands, violates Plaintiffs’ rights thereto. SB 670 directly conflicts with Federal law relating to mining, and stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment of the full purposes and objectives of Congress in enacting not only the mining laws but all other laws stated above. All matters dealt with by SB 670 are preempted and fully occupied by the laws of the United States, including without limitation, its mining laws, its environmental laws, its laws relating to clean water, 33 U.S.C. § 1151, et seq. (2004), and its laws relating to endangered species, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531, et seq. (2004).
94. The issuance of a permit for vacuum or suction dredge mining to a mining claim owner, miner and/or prospector by DF&G is a non-discretionary act, and not a discretionary act. The mining laws, as set forth above, give to the miner and/or prospector an absolute and exclusive right to enter and use the Federal public lands, and the rivers, streams, lakes and waterways running therein, for the purpose of mining and developing his or her mineral estate. The Mining Act of 1866 states:
“That the mineral lands of the public domain, both surveyed and unsurveyed, are hereby declared to be free and open to exploration and occupation by all citizens of the United States, and those who have declared their intention to become citizens, subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by law, and subject also to the local custom or rules of miners in the several mining districts, so far as the same may not be in conflict with the laws of the United States.”



COUNT II: Deprivation of Property and Due Process
95. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 94 of this Complaint.
96. Prior to the passage of SB 670, plaintiffs invested many thousands of dollars in order to be able to engage in vacuum and suction dredge mining. Plaintiffs obtained Federal mining claims, invested substantial sums in those claims, kept those claims current, paid taxes on those claims, bought and sold equipment, paid permit fees to DF&G, and otherwise spent substantial sums of money for the purpose of conducting mineral exploration and development pursuant to the laws of the United States and the State of California.
97. The due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Article I § 7(a) of the Constitution of California, prohibit the deprivation of property without due process of law. The Plaintiffs have constitutionally protected property rights and mineral estates that they own or lease in California. The passage of SB 670 makes such property and mineral estates worthless or near worthless. The State of California, through
and by the passage of SB 670, has wrongfully taken plaintiffs’ property without compensation in violation of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California.
98. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, have deprived the Plaintiffs of their property rights without procedural due process of law in at least the following ways:
a. Failing to give the Plaintiffs notice and an opportunity for a hearing prior to the deprivations; and
b. Failing to provide a mechanism for the Plaintiffs to contest the deprivations of their property rights once they occurred.
99. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, have deprived the Plaintiffs of substantive due process under the 5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States and Article I § 7(a) and Article I §§ 7(a) and 19 of the Constitution of California in at least the following ways:
a. Defendants’ deprivations of Plaintiffs’ property rights are arbitrary and capricious;
b. SB 670 has no rational relationship to any legitimate public purpose; rather it was motivated solely by the improper political purpose of totally prohibiting vacuum or suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California;
c. SB 670 singles out Plaintiffs for extraordinary treatment different from that accorded to all other potential mineral developers that utilize different methods of mining, or use suction dredge equipment for extensive non-mining purposes. These extensive non-mining purposes have the same effect as suction dredge mining for minerals, and in many cases, far exceed any disturbance to the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California, and the biota therein, allegedly caused by suction dredge mining;
d. SB 670 is in direct conflict with the laws of the United States, which state that the mining of minerals on and within Federal lands is necessary for the economic development and security of the United States.
e. SB 670 is in direct conflict with the laws of the State of California, which assert that mining of minerals within the State is necessary for the economic development of the State and Nation;
f. SB 670 contains no standards to apply in that it affects every river, stream, lake, and waterway in California whether or not there are any fish, aquatic life, or biota therein, or any living organism that could possibly be affected in any way whatsoever by vacuum or suction dredge mining; and
g. SB 670 is in direct conflict with the encouragement of mining, including vacuum or suction dredge mining by and in the State of California, as being essential to the economic well-being of California, its people, and the needs of society. Thus, Defendants deprivation of Plaintiffs’ property is manifestly unfair, given that the Plaintiffs, with the State of California’s encouragement, have made a substantial investment for the exploration and development of minerals through suction dredge mining.
///
///

COUNT III: Denial of Equal Protection
100. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 99 of this Complaint.
101. The Plaintiffs are entitled to equal protection under the laws of California pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and Article I § 7(a) of the Constitution of the State of California.
102. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, specifically intended to deny, and have denied, Plaintiffs the same treatment, privileges, and immunities received by all other mine owners and operators, or potential mine owners or operators, that utilize other than vacuum or suction dredge mining methods, or users of vacuum and suction dredge equipment for purposes other than mining within the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California.
103. There is no rational basis for this difference and treatment which has denied Plaintiffs’ equal protection under the laws.


COUNT IV: Taking of Property Without Compensation
104. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 103 of this Complaint.
105. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, have deprived Plaintiffs of their mineral rights and estates within the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California in violation of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States; and Article I § 7(a) and Article I § 19 of the Constitution of California.
106. SB 670 contains no provision for compensating the Plaintiffs for the substantial property deprivations they have suffered, and will suffer, and the defendants have not compensated, nor offered to compensate, Plaintiffs for such deprivation. Defendants have made clear that they do not intend to offer any such compensation.
107. Plaintiffs are entitled to just compensation for their property taken.
108. The Defendants’ actions in preparing, adopting, and implementing SB 670 and other rules and policies that interfere with, and prohibit, the Plaintiffs’ rights to prospect, and to access their mining claims and mineral estates in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California, were without public purpose, and in direct conflict with the laws of the United States. Such actions have caused and will continue to cause immediate, direct, adverse and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs and other miners and prospectors.


COUNT V: Violation of Civil Rights
109. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 108 of this Complaint.
110. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, have deprived Plaintiffs of their mineral rights, estates, and property within the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California, as well as depriving Plaintiffs of rights, privileges, and immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as well as the Constitution and laws of the State of California, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys’ and experts’ fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
///
///
///

COUNT VI: Violation of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970,
30 U.S.C. § 21a
111. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 110 of this Complaint.
112. The Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, 30 U.S.C. § 21a, declares that it is the continuing policy of the Federal Government to foster and encourage private enterprise in the development of a stable domestic minerals industry and the orderly and economic development of domestic mineral resources. This act includes all minerals, including sand and gravel, geothermal, coals, and oil and gas. 30 U.S.C. § 615 prohibits the interference, limitation, or restriction of any existing rights to any Federal mining claimant holding a valid mining claim on Federal lands.
113. SB 670 hinders the national policy as expressed by Congress to foster and develop mining and mineral resources. The actions of Defendants as set forth above, in closing and prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within Federal lands in California violates the policy of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act as set forth above.
114. Defendants’ actions were in direct violation of Congressional intent and purpose as set forth above, and an abuse of Plaintiffs’ rights. These actions of Defendants have caused, and will continue to cause, immediate, direct, adverse, and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs, other miners and prospectors, and the United States, as well as the State of California.
///
///
///

COUNT VII: Violation of 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54 (Mining Act)
115. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 114 of this Complaint.
116. 30 U.S.C. § 22 states that: “Except as otherwise provided, all valuable mineral deposits in lands belonging to the United States, both surveyed and unsurveyed, shall be free and open to exploration and purchase, and the lands in which they are found to occupation and purchase, by citizens of the United States and those who have declared their intention to become such, under regulations prescribed by law, and according to the local customs or rules of miners in the several mining districts, so far as the same are applicable and not inconstant with the laws of the United States”. 30 U.S.C. § 615 prohibits the interference, limitation, or restriction of any existing rights of any mining claimant holding a valid mining claim on Federal lands.
117. The lands of the United States cannot be free and open to exploration if the historical means of development and utilization by prospectors and miners can be prohibited by SB 670’s prohibitions and closures, either temporarily or permanently, in an attempt to substitute any other judgment for that of Congress. SB 670 is prohibitive and not merely regulatory.
118. The actions of SB 670 as set forth above in closing and prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining to prospecting and developing of mining claims in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California within Federal lands violates the purpose of the aforesaid Act.
119. Defendants’ actions in violating 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54 (Mining Act) were in direct violation of Congressional intent and purpose as set forth above, and an abuse of Plaintiffs’ rights. These actions have caused and will continue to cause, immediate, direct, adverse, and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs, other miners and prospectors, as well as citizens of the United States who wish to become prospectors and miners.

COUNT VIII: Violation of Plaintiffs’ Implied Rights to Use Public Lands
120. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 119 of this Complaint.
121. The mining laws, and other statutes enacted by Congress, granting the right to prospect and mine on the public lands throughout the Western United States, including California, as well as the granting of mining claims and mineral estates to Plaintiffs, and other miners and prospectors, implies a right of access to the minerals therein accompanying the grant, arising out of the rules and customs of prospectors and miners to use such methods as are available for prospecting and mining on Federal lands, and to access their mining claims and mineral estates in an unimpeded manner. Closure by SB 670 to vacuum and suction dredge mining on the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California within Federal lands adversely and unlawfully interferes with their implied right, causing them harm and damages.
122. The actions of SB 670, as set forth above, in closing and prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining or prospecting and developing of mining claims in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California within Federal lands violates the aforesaid implied right of Plaintiffs. Therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to an order quieting title to their mining claims and mineral estates, including their right to use vacuum and suction dredge mining in prospecting on Federal lands, and developing their aforesaid mining claims and mineral estates. 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a).
123. The Defendants’ actions in preparing, adopting and implementing the proposed closure and prohibition, and other rules and policies that interfere with the Plaintiffs’ implied right were in unlawful derogation of Plaintiffs’ rights. Such actions have caused and will continue to cause immediate, direct, adverse and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs, and other miners and prospectors.


COUNT IX: Unlawful Interference with Commerce
124. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 123 of this Complaint.
125. Plaintiffs are small business entities that engage in interstate and foreign commerce. The Federal government encourages and favors small business entities. It has established the Small Business Administration to assist such entities, and has passed special laws, rules, and regulations favoring and protecting small business entities. Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. § 603(b) as amended by The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Of 1996) 5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808.
126. The Plaintiffs sell or buy valuable minerals obtained through vacuum or suction dredge mining in California on federal lands. Plaintiffs sell such minerals throughout the United States and in foreign commerce. Plaintiffs also use such minerals obtained from federal lands in the manufacture of valuable products that are sold throughout the United States and in foreign commerce.
127. Many citizens of other States and foreign countries come to California in order to engage in vacuum and suction dredge mining for valuable minerals. These non-California citizens purchase permits from DF&G in order to engage in vacuum or suction dredge mining.
128. The total amount of money spent and invested by these mining claim owners, prospectors and miners in suction dredge mining amounts to many millions of dollars each year. The Plaintiffs, and other prospectors and miners, including non-citizens of California, as set forth above, engage in these activities that are specifically authorized, protected, and encouraged by Congress. The Plaintiffs, and other prospectors and miners, including non-citizens of California, engage in interstate and foreign commerce, as set forth above, such interstate and foreign commerce being specifically authorized, protected, and encouraged by Congress.
129. Plaintiffs, and other persons, as set forth above, spend many millions of dollars each year on goods, services, equipment, food, and other supplies both in and out of the State of California in order to engage in suction dredge mining within the State of California.
130. SB 670, by imposing a total prohibition on suction dredge mining in the State of California constitutes an impermissible burden on interstate and foreign commerce in direct
violation of the Constitution of the United States, Article I, § 8, and in direct conflict and in direct violation of the intent and purpose of Congress.
131. Defendants’ actions constituting an undue burden on domestic and foreign commerce are in violation of the Constitution of the United States, Article I, § 8, and are in violation of Congressional intent and purpose as set forth above, and an unlawful derogation and prohibition of Plaintiffs’ rights. These actions have caused, and will continue to cause, immediate, direct, adverse, and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs, non-citizens of California, other miners and prospectors, and citizens of the United States who wish to become prospectors and miners.


COUNT X: Injunctive Relief
132. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 131 of this Complaint.
133. Plaintiffs request injunctive relief, since the harm to them from the actions of the Defendants in enacting and implementing SB 670 prohibits them from prospecting and accessing their mining claims and mineral estates in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways in California within Federal lands. This causes damage to them which is immediate and irreparable, because they must be able to use vacuum and suction dredge methods of mining and prospecting in order to feasibly and economically prospect and mine on their mining claims and mineral estates.
134. The actions of the Defendants as set forth above in closing and prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining and prospecting and developing of their mining claims and mineral estates causes Plaintiffs irreparable harm and entitles them to immediate injunctive relief.
135. The Defendants’ actions in preparing, adopting and implementing the closure, prohibition, and other rules and policies that interfere with the Plaintiffs’ rights to prospect, and to access their mining claims and mineral estates as set forth above, are in derogation of Plaintiffs’ rights. Such actions by Defendants have caused, and will continue to cause, immediate, direct, adverse and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs and other miners and prospectors.
136. Plaintiffs are entitled to an immediate injunction, including, without limitation, a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and permanent injunction, enjoining and restraining Defendants from the implementation and enforcement of SB 670, and enjoining and restraining Defendants from interfering with Plaintiffs’ rights to prospect, to access and develop their mining claims and mineral estates, as set forth above, through all lawful means, including, without limitation, motorized mining methods such as vacuum and suction dredging, or by other lawful means.
///

COUNT XI: Damages
137. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 136 of this Complaint.
138. As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid violations by Defendants as set forth in Counts I – X of this Complaint, Plaintiffs have suffered present and future damages in an amount not presently ascertainable, the exact amount to be proven at trial.


DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully pray that this Court:
1. Adjudge and declare that the challenged prohibition and closure of the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways in California is unlawful pursuant to all the acts, laws, and regulations as set forth in Counts I – XI of this Complaint, and that Defendants have acted beyond the scope of their legal authority in adopting those actions, and that such actions violate the Constitution of the United States, and the State of California as set forth above;
2. Enjoin and restrain Defendants, their agents, employees, successors, and all persons acting in concert or participating with them, from enforcing or implementing, and requiring others to enforce or implement, the aforesaid prohibition and closure and related rules, regulations, and polices; and issue a temporary, preliminary and/or permanent injunction against Defendants pursuant to Rule 65, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
3. Declare unlawful and set aside SB 670, as being in violation of the Constitution of the United States,and the laws of the United States, as well as the Constitution of the State of California;
4. Issue and order quieting title to Plaintiffs’ mining claims and mineral estates by determining Plaintiffs’ aforesaid property is benefited by an implied right to use vacuum and suction dredge mining in order to prospect on Federal lands and develop Plaintiffs’ mining claims and mineral estates.
5. Grant such damages as are proven at trial, with interest on the damages at the maximum annual rate as allowed by law, from such earliest date as allowed by law;
6. Award the Plaintiffs their reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including expert costs, and expenses of litigation as allowed by law, including, without limitation, and as applicable, the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 241, et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1988, California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5, the common fund doctrine, and other applicable laws, concepts or doctrines, whether legal or equitable, rules of Court, or other rules and regulations; and
7. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper, including an award of attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses.

Dated: September 14, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID YOUNG
By /s/ David Young David Young
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Last Updated ( Thursday, 14 January 2010 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Sponsored Links

World Gold Price

[www.kitco.com]