PUBLIC LANDS FOR THE PEOPLE File Lawsuit Against SB 670 PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 16 November 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC LANDS FOR THE PEOPLE, INC., a California 501 C-3, non-profit corporation; Gerald E. Hobbs; Patrick Keene; Keene Engineering Co., Inc., a California corporation; Robert Haiduck; Terry Stapp; Dee Stapp; David DeCosta; James Gregory Lee; Mike Holt; Todd Bracken; Shannon Poe; and David Richard,

Plaintiffs,
v.

State of California; Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; California Department of Fish & Game; and Donald Koch, in his official capacity as Director, California Department of Fish & Game; and Does 1-20,

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
COMPLAINT FOR:

Adjudication of Federal Preemption and Supremacy Relating to the Mining Laws of the United States;
Deprivation of Property Rights and Due Process of Law; Denial of Equal Protection of the Laws; Taking of Property Without Compensation; Violation of Civil Rights; Violation of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, 30 U.S.C. § 21a; Violation of 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54 (Mining Act); Violation of Plaintiffs’ Implied Rights to Use Public Lands (Quiet Title); Unlawful Interference With Commerce; Injunctive Relief; and Damages.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because this action arises under the laws of the United States. The conduct complained of creates an actual, justiciable controversy. The California legislature has passed an act, SB 670, and the Governor of California, the Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed into law SB 670, prohibiting all motorized mining, including vacuum and suction dredge mining, in the rivers, streams, and waterways of California, in derogation of Federal law authorizing, protecting, and permitting such mining.
2. This Court has jurisdiction, among other matters, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question), §§ 2201, 2202 (declaratory relief), § 2202 (injunctive relief), and § 2409(a) (quiet title).
3. This action arises under the various acts, regulations, laws, and constitutions, as set forth in paragraph 8.
4. This Court has the power to grant declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
5. This lawsuit requests judicial review of final actions taken by the Defendants (or their predecessors-in-interest). Defendants’ actions unlawfully abrogate, prescribe, and/or prohibit Federal statutorily prescribed rights of unpatented mining claim owners, miners and prospectors as well as violating Federal statutorily prescribed methods relating to mining and prospecting on Federal lands in the State of California.
6. Defendants are attempting to unlawfully alter the entire Federal regulatory framework for citizens, miners and prospectors in the State of California by adopting a rigid, narrow, and single-focus policy regarding closure of all rivers, streams, and waterways to motorized mining methods, including without limitation, vacuum and suction dredge mining. Defendants failed to consider any meaningful alternatives which could be applied specifically to miners, prospectors, and other citizens who are potential miners and prospectors.
7. This is an action for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief (Rule 65, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), as well as for damages incurred by Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs request the Court to declare unlawful, enjoin implementation of, and set aside the promulgation and adoption by the legislature and the Governor of California of the prohibition of all motorized means of mining in the rivers, streams, and waterways of California, including without limitation, vacuum and suction dredge mining, not only as it applies to miners and prospectors, but also all other members of the public who are potential mining claimants, miners and prospectors.
8. The Plaintiffs seek an Order from this Court declaring that Defendants’ actions in adopting and implementing a prohibition of all motorized methods of mining, including without limitation, vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, and waterways of California as applied to miners and prospectors, and those who intend to become miners and prospectors, violated the following:
A. National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (1969); and Executive Orders: EO 12291 and EO 12866;
B. Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act (“MUSYA”), 16 U.S.C. § 528 et seq. (1960);
C. Numerous sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), as set forth in 36 CFR 228 et seq.; 36 CFR 261 et seq.; 43 CFR 3800; 43 CFR 3809.1 et seq., including without limitation 43 CFR 3809.3; and also including without limitation, numerous other sections of the CFRs regulating mining, prospecting, and associated activities on Federal lands.
D. The Federal Lands Policy and Management Act (“FLPMA”) 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., including without limitation §§ 1732(b), 1761 and 1769;
E. PL No. 104-208, 110 Stat.3009 § 108 (Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997);
F. 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54 (Mining Act), including without limitation the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, 30 U.S.C. § 21(a);
G. 16 U.S.C. § 481 (Use of Waters);
H. 30 U.S.C. § 612, 613, 615 (Multiple Surface Use Act);
I. 5 U.S.C. §§ 601, 602, 603(b) and © (Regulatory Flexibility Act As Amended By The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808) [SBREFA]);
J. The Endangered Species Act 16 U.S.C. § 1531;
K. California Civil Code § 3479 et seq.;
L. California Code of Civil Procedure § 731;
M. The 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States;
N. Article I § 8 (Commerce Clause) of the Constitution of the United States;
O. Article I § 7(a) of the Constitution of California; and
P. Article I § 19 of the Constitution of California.
9. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1391(b) and (e), and
because the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims occurred within this judicial district.

INTRODUCTION
10. This case presents a classic conflict between prospectors, miners who hold unpatented or patented mining claims on Federal lands pursuant to the mining laws of the United States, and the State of California, Department of Fish and Game (“DF&G”). Until recently, DF&G issued permits for vacuum and suction dredge prospecting and mining on such claims for rivers, streams, and waterways in the State of California running through such Federal mining claims and estates, and unclaimed Federal lands open to prospecting and mining.
11. Beginning on August 6, 2009, DF&G would no longer issue permits for vacuum and suction dredge mining on Federal mining claims, and cancelled all such permits previously issued. This had the effect of prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining and prospecting in the State of California on all Federal mining claims and lands, and unclaimed lands open to location and entry under the United States mining laws, and unlawfully prohibited the location, utilization and development of mining claims and mineral estates in California. This unlawfully affected and unconstitutionally burdened interstate and foreign commerce, since many of the prospectors, and mining claim and mineral estate owners, are non-residents of California who prospect or work their claims and mineral estates in California with vacuum and suction dredges. This affected not only California residents who are mining claim owners, prospectors and miners, but also non-resident mining claim owners, prospectors and miners who purchased non-resident permits from DF&G in order to engage in vacuum and suction dredge mining in the State of California. This also had the effect of stopping the sale of equipment and accessories for vacuum and suction dredge mining both within and without the State of California. This placed an unlawful, unconstitutional, and undue burden and restriction on interstate and foreign commerce in the sale of the aforesaid mining equipment and accessories.
12. The California DF&G claims authorization to issue permits for vacuum and suction dredge mining in the State of California, even when such mining occurs on Federal lands and is pursuant to the mining laws of the United States. California Fish and Game Code § 5653 et seq.; California Code of Regulations 14 CCR § 228. Waters within the boundaries of Federal lands, including National Forests, National Parks, and lands within the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) may be used for mining. 16 U.S.C. § 481. The attempt to stop suction dredge mining in California has a long and tangled history.
13. In 2004, the Karuk Tribe filed suit in the United States District Court in Oakland, California for declaratory and injunctive relief alleging improper management of suction dredge and other mining operations in waterways and riparian areas within the Klamath National Forest. The Karuk Tribe claimed violation of the National Forest Management Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and the Endangered Species Act. Judgment was rendered against the Karuk Tribe and for the defendants. Karuk Tribe of California vs. United States Forest Service, et al., 379 F.Supp.2d 1071 (2005). Anticipating a loss in Federal Court, the Karuk Tribe decided to try their legal luck in State Court. On May 6, 2005, the Karuk Tribe of California filed suit against the California Department of Fish and Game in the Superior Court of Alameda County. Karuk Tribe of California; and Leaf Hillman, Plaintiffs, v. California Department of Fish and Game; and Ryan Broddrick, Director, California Department of Fish and Game, Defendants, Case No. RG 05211597. The case was heard by Judge Bonnie Sabraw. Judge Sabraw is now retired, and the case was transferred to the Honorable Frank Roesch, Judge of the Superior Court, Alameda County. The object of this lawsuit was to stop all suction dredge mining in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, and specified tributaries, supposedly in order to protect Coho salmon. No notice was initially given to any miners that this litigation had been filed. The Karuk Tribe is headquartered on the Klamath River in Happy Camp, California.
14. The California Department of Fish and Game (“DF&G”) at first opposed the allegations of the Karuk Tribe as set forth in its Complaint. Soon however, DF&G decided to capitulate to the Karuk Tribe. DF&G, effective November 30, 2005, issued regulations severely restricting suction dredge mining in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers and their tributaries. These regulations specifically referenced the litigation brought by the Karuk Tribe in Alameda County. In addition, the Karuk Tribe and DF&G presented to Judge Sabraw a “Proposed Stipulated Judgment,” and later a modified “Proposed Stipulated Judgment,” which would have enjoined and restrained DF&G from issuing permits for suction dredge mining “for the Klamath, Salmon, and Scott Rivers, their tributaries and thermal refugia.”
15. The first that the miners heard of the State Court litigation filed by the Karuk Tribe in Alameda County was approximately December 7, 2005, when they were refused suction dredge mining permits by DF&G affecting the whole State of California, because of the Karuk Tribe litigation. At this stage, Judge Sabraw had issued no order authorizing such prohibition. DF&G did this without any rule making authority or process whatsoever, or in compliance with any court order.
16. The mining claim owners and miners who were denied permits by DF&G contacted Mr. Hobbs, as President of PLP, and informed him of their situation. Mr. Hobbs informed other mining groups of the Karuk Tribe litigation, and the unilateral and unauthorized prohibitions placed on suction dredge mining in California by DF&G. Mr. Hobbs requested the Court not to sign the Proposed Stipulated Judgment (“PSJ”). In 2006, Mr. Hobbs, and another mining organization, were allowed by Judge Sabraw to intervene in the Karuk Tribe litigation. Mr. Hobbs immediately set about opposing the PSJ which the Karuk Tribe and DF&G had presented to Judge Sabraw.
17. After extensive briefings and hearings by all parties, on June 16, 2006, Judge Sabraw issued the Court’s “Order Denying Motion to Enter Judgment.” Judge Sabraw specifically found that the PSJ which would have prohibited suction dredge mining in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, and their tributaries, “was contrary to law and public policy.”
18. DF&G initially opposed the Karuk Tribe in the litigation before Judge Sabraw. However, DF&G has openly admitted that it does not want to be the agency administering suction dredge mining in California. Seeing an opportunity to rid itself of issuing permits for suction dredge mining, DF&G decided to switch horses in mid-stream.
19. Thereafter, DF&G changed its position and filed two affidavits from its officials and employees asserting that suction dredge mining could have an adverse effect on Coho Salmon in the litigation relating to the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers. The miners strongly disputed any such alleged admissions of DF&G.
20. No miner in California would ever rely on DF&G to protect his or her interest. The mining community in California has no confidence in DF&G to protect their interest in anything relating to mining.
21. Judge Sabraw encouraged all parties to enter into settlement negotiations. After two meetings in Sacramento, and much blood, sweat, and tears, all parties were finally able to reach settlement of the Karuk Tribe litigation. On December 20, 2006, Judge Sabraw entered the Court’s Order and Consent Judgment. The heart of the Court’s December 20, 2006, Order and Consent Judgment was that DF&G will conduct a review relating to the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq., which was to be completed within 18 months. During this period, suction dredge mining was to be permitted in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, and their tributaries. All requests for injunctive relief against DF&G barring suction dredge mining were withdrawn pending such environmental review. Thus, suction dredge mining continued pending an environmental determination as to whether any prohibition whatsoever would be justified.
22. The heart of Judge Sabraw’s Order and Consent Judgment reads as follows:
“THEREFORE, the Department is hereby ORDERED to conduct a further environmental review pursuant to CEQA of its suction dredge mining regulations and to implement, if necessary, via rulemaking, mitigation measures to protect the Coho salmon and/or other special status fish species in the watershed of the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, listed as threatened or endangered after the 1994 EIR.”

23. The aforesaid review was to be completed within eighteen months, and the Court retained jurisdiction of the matter. DF&G was not able to complete the review in the time frame set by Judge Sabraw, claiming (a) that they could not do an EIR limited to only the Klamath, Scott and Salmon Rivers, but had to do an all inclusive statewide EIR; and (b) further claiming that the California financial crisis prevented it from being funded by the legislature to complete the DF&G unilaterally expanded statewide review. There is now pending a hearing before Judge Roesch to hold DF&G and its Director, Donald Koch, in contempt for failing to timely complete the DF&G inspired statewide review.
24. The two suspect affidavits filed by DF&G turned out to cost the State $230,000.00. The Karuk Tribe later filed a motion for attorneys fees against DF&G, who, after negotiations, agreed to and did pay the Karuk Tribe $230,000.00. The Karuk Tribe agreed to seek no further attorneys fees in the litigation before Judge Sabraw.
25. Although the Karuk Tribe consented to the judgment entered by Judge Sabraw on December 20, 2006, the Karuk Tribe then became an initiator and supporter of new legislation, AB 1032, which supposedly was meant to protect trout by prohibiting suction dredge gold mining in approximately sixty-eight rivers throughout California, including the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers. AB 1032 was unusual in referring numerous times to the Karuk Tribe litigation in Alameda County, still then pending before Judge Sabraw. AB 1032 by its terms was to remain in effect until January 1, 2011, unless DF&G has completed the CEQA environmental review prior to that date which has been mandated by Judge Sabraw in the Karuk Tribe litigation in Alameda County. Thus, the heart of AB 1032 was to prohibit suction dredge gold mining in sixty-eight rivers throughout California, including the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, and their tributaries, until the CEQA environmental review is completed. This stood Judge Sabraw’s December 20, 2006, Order and Consent Judgment on its head.
26. Judge Sabraw refused to prohibit any such suction dredge mining, including gold mining, until the environmental review was completed. The environmental review had to be completed first in order to see whether or not any such prohibition would be justified. Even in the unlikely event an environmental review would justify suction dredge mining prohibitions in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers; any such prohibition set forth in AB 1032 would be immediately repealed upon the completion of the environmental review ordered by Judge Sabraw. AB 1032 was inherently illogical, since it applied only to suction dredge gold mining, and allowed all other types of suction dredge mining, including mining for silver, copper, lead,
mercury, and other heavy metals and precious and semi-precious gems. However, AB 1032’s inherently illogical provisions were not its chief fault and defect.
27. AB 1032 was meant to subvert Judge Sabraw’s court order permitting suction dredge mining, including gold mining, in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers pending an environmental review. AB 1032 was special, private, legislation that enhanced the Karuk Tribe’s economic and political position in a way that Judge Sabraw, after hearings and consideration, refused to sanction.
28. Plaintiff Gerald E. Hobbs testified before the legislature against the passage of AB 1032. However, AB 1032 was eventually passed and went to Governor Schwarzenegger for his signature. What AB 1032 was meant to do is make Governor Schwarzenegger a party to the subversion of a valid court order. AB 1032 struck at the very heart of a court’s authority to uphold the rule of law. Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 1032.
29. In his veto message, Governor Schwarzenegger stated:
“I am returning Assembly Bill 1032 without my signature. The purpose of this bill is to protect fish and wildlife from the potential deleterious effects of suction dredge mining. Although I appreciate the author’s intent and the need to protect our fish, wildlife, and water resources, this bill is unnecessary. Current law gives the Department of Fish and Game (Department) the necessary authority to protect fish and wildlife resources from suction dredge mining. It has promulgated regulations and issues permits for this activity. Permits for suction dredge mining must ensure that these operations are not deleterious to fish and allow the Department to specify the type and size of equipment to be used. In its regulations, the Department may also designate specific waters or areas that are closed to dredging. It is unclear why this bill specifically targets a number of specific waterways for closure or further restrictions. The listed waterways represent only a small fraction of the waters in our State where suction dredging is occurring. The benefit or protection from such a minor closure is negligible and supports the notion that scientific environmental review should precede such decisions.”

30. After Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 1032, legislative allies of the Karuk Tribe then attempted to stop suction dredge mining in California by attaching a prohibition of such mining to the California state budget bill. Governor Schwarzenegger line-item vetoed that attempt.
31. After the stealth attack on suction dredge mining via the state budget failed, the Karuk Tribe then petitioned the Department of Fish & Game to have suction dredge mining prohibited throughout California. DF&G rejected the Karuk Tribe’s petition.
32. This did not stop the Karuk Tribe’s longstanding attempt to end suction dredge mining in California. On February 5, 2009, three members and officials of the Karuk Tribe filed a purported taxpayers action in the Alameda County Superior Court seeking to stop suction dredge mining throughout all of California. Hillman et al. v. California Department of Fish and Game. Case No. RG009 434444. That case was eventually assigned to Judge Roesch, in light of his involvement with the prior Karuk Tribe litigation upon the retirement of Judge Sabraw.
33. After pointing out to the Court that the supposed outraged taxpayer Plaintiffs were really stand-ins for the Karuk Tribe, an amended Complaint was filed consisting of the Karuk Tribe, its three initial members, and a bevy of environmental groups and allies of the Karuk Tribe.
34. The same relief the Karuk Tribe sought in the taxpayer suit, Hillman v. DF&G, supra, could have been brought in the initial case heard by Judge Sabraw, Karuk Tribe v. DF&G, supra. That case is still subject to the Superior Court’s jurisdiction. However, since no further attorneys fees could be obtained in Karuk Tribe v. DF&G, a supposed taxpayers’ suit was initiated with the hope of obtaining further attorney’s fees. The State is concerned that in light of the Preliminary Injunction issued by Judge Roesch, they will be subject to further substantial attorney’s fees.
35. The Karuk Tribe then sought a Preliminary Injunction in the taxpayers’ action before Judge Roesch. On July 10, 2009, Judge Roesch issued a Preliminary Injunction, relying on the two suspect affidavits filed by officials and employees of DF&G relating to Coho salmon in the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers in the litigation initiated before Judge Sabraw.
36. The Preliminary Injunction ordered by Judge Roesch prohibited the California Department of Fish and Game from issuing any permits for suction dredge mining in every river, stream, and waterway throughout California. Judge Roesch’s Preliminary Injunction applied to every river, stream, and waterway in California irrespective of whether or not they had any Coho salmon in them or indeed any fish at all. Only a small percentage of the rivers, streams, and waterways in California have any salmon in them whatsoever, and a substantially smaller percentage contain any Coho salmon. The Preliminary Injunction ordered by Judge Roesch is presently on appeal.
37. On February 27, 2009, another attempt was made by the Karuk Tribe to circumvent Judge Sabraw’s Order. Allies of the Karuk Tribe introduced SB 670 in the State Senate again seeking to prohibit all suction dredge mining in every river, stream, lake, and waterway in California until a CEQA review had been completed and new regulations were operative. The prohibition would take place whether or not there were Coho salmon, trout, minnows, or any fish whatsoever in any of the State’s waters. SB 670 was, in many respects, a replay of AB 1032.
38. SB 670 was aimed at suction dredge mining, and prohibited the issuance by DF&G of any new permits for suction dredge mining in California. In addition, SB 670 invalidated any prior permits issued by DF&G for suction dredge mining. SB 670 prohibited suction dredge mining in every river, stream, lake, and waterway throughout the State of California, not just the three rivers in the initial suit brought before Judge Sabraw--the Klamath, Scott and Salmon Rivers--nor the 68 rivers and streams targeted in AB 1032. This prohibitory progression is regulation run riot.
39. SB 670 passed the legislature and was sent to Governor Schwarzenegger for his signature. Reversing his position where he vetoed AB 1032, and the attempt to prohibit suction dredge mining through a rider to the state budget. Governor Schwarzenegger signed SB 670 into law. This constituted a triumph of money and raw political power over the laws of the United States, including without limitation, those laws relating to mining on Federal lands.
40. For Plaintiff Public Lands for the People, Inc. (“PLP”), and its members as well as all other Plaintiffs, suction dredge prospecting and mining in the rivers, streams, and waterways of California is not recreational. It is an important economic endeavor that has a direct economic impact on family finances, business finances, and in these hard economic times, often is the difference between having to choose whether to put gas in the car, or buy food or medicine for the family. For PLP and its members, and all other Plaintiffs, suction dredge prospecting and mining is not merely a question of having “fun”. Prohibiting suction dredge mining to prospectors and miners, who are Federal mineral estate grantees, forces them to face serious economic hardship. With a perilous economy, being able to sell even an ounce of gold for over $900.00 makes a substantial difference as to the economic choices a family has regarding basic necessities.
41. Prospecting, placer mining, suction dredge mining, and granted rights of way associated with mining and prospecting activities, all of which are mining operations pursuant to the mining laws and the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), and all of which have valid pre-existing rights pursuant to the mining laws and CFRs, are traditionally common in the State of California, and done in accordance with the rules and customs of miners. Suction dredge mining is the only reasonable, economical, and environmentally sound method for extracting precious metals from the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways in California.
42. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that prohibition of vacuum and suction dredge mining has already taken place and is being implemented. DF&G has sent letters to holders of permits validly issued prior to the passage of SB 670 telling them to cease and desist all suction dredge mining in California. DF&G will no longer issue permits for suction dredge mining in California.
43. This has direct and immediate effect upon mining claim owners, prospectors and miners in California, in that they need mechanized methods of mining, including vacuum and suction dredge mining, in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California in order to economically prospect and mine in those rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways, and to engage in other associated mining activities therein. DF&G asserts that permits are needed in order to engage in vacuum or suction dredge mining anywhere in the State of California, whether such mining occurs on private, State, or Federal lands, or pursuant to mining claims authorized by the State of California or the United States, or authorized in any manner whatsoever.
44. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that the prohibition of vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California will affect over ninety-five percent (95%) of all mineral production from the aforesaid rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways.
45. The legislature did not consider any alternatives to the prohibition of all motorized means of mining, including vacuum and suction dredge mining, in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California.


SB 670
46. SB 670 adds to the CF&GC a newly enacted Section 5653.1.
47. Present law prohibits the use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment by any person in any river, stream, or lake in California without a permit issued by DF&G. California Fish and Game Code § 5653 (“CF&GC”). On average, DF&G has issued approximately 3,200 suction dredge mining permits to California residents every year for the last fifteen (15) years. It is estimated that suction dredge miners, resident and non-resident, spend approximately $60,000,000 in the rural counties of California on supplies, fuel, food, camping, equipment, hardware, lodging, goods and services. Any person required to possess a permit pursuant to Section 5653, shall present his or her dredging equipment for inspection upon request of a State or County Fish and Game Warden. CF&GC § 5653.3. For purposes of §§ 5653 and 5653.3, “person” does not include a partnership, corporation, or other type of association. Under existing law, it is unlawful to possess a vacuum or suction dredge in areas, or in or within a hundred yards of waters that are closed to the use of vacuum or suction dredges. A violation of the permit requirement is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000.00 and six months in jail. CF&GC § 5653 et seq.; 14 CCR § 228 et seq. The Plaintiffs, as well as other miners and prospectors, are concerned that they will be cited for a criminal violation by DF&G should they attempt to engage in vacuum or suction dredge mining, as well as any other motorized mining use.
48. DF&G is authorized to close areas otherwise open for dredging and for which permits have been issued, if there is an unanticipated water level change and the department determines that the closure is necessary to protect wildlife and water resources. 14 CCR § 228. No such determination has been made by DF&G as it relates to SB 670.
49. Existing law requires DF&G to adopt regulations to implement certain of the vacuum and suction dredge equipment requirements, and authorizes the DF&G to issue regulations with respect to other requirements. Existing law requires that the regulations be adopted in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. CF&GC § 5653.9.
50. CEQA requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a “project”, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. SB 670 declares that the issuance of permits to operate vacuum or suction dredge equipment is a “project” pursuant to CEQA. CF&GC § 5653.1(a).
51. The act exempts from its provisions, among other things, certain types of ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, and emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service. CF&GC § 21080(b)(1); 14 CCR § 15060©(1). The issuance of permits for vacuum or suction dredge mining authorized by Federal law is a non-discretionary and ministerial act.
52. After SB 670 designated the issuance of permits to operate vacuum or suction dredge equipment to be a “project” under CEQA, it suspended the issuance of permits, including permits issued prior to the passage of SB 670, and any mining pursuant to such permit, until the DF&G has completed an environmental impact report for the “project” as ordered by the Court in Karuk Tribe et al. v. California Department of Fish and Game, et al., Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG 05211597. DF&G has stated that it will not complete the Court ordered environmental review of its permitting program until, at the earliest, in the late summer of 2011.
53. SB 670 prohibits the use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment in any river, stream, or lake, for in-stream mining purposes, until the director of DF&G certifies to the Secretary of State that: 1) The DF&G has completed the environmental review of its existing vacuum or suction dredging regulations as ordered by the Court; 2) DF&G has transmitted for filing with the Secretary of State, a certified copy of new regulations as necessary; and 3) the new regulations are operative. There is no time frame set for this cascade of contingencies, and there is no realistic expectation that they will ever be completed within the next decade, if then.
54. In trying to explain why the completion of the environmental impact report will take so long, DF&G has stated that:
“Q: When will the EIR be completed? DFG is preparing a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to conduct the court-ordered review. DFG estimates at this point that it will complete and certify the Subsequent EIR (and updates to the existing regulations, if necessary) after a series of public meetings and other opportunities for public comment and review by late summer 2011. The environmental review and regulation processes are governed by the California Environmental Quality Act and the Administrative Procedures Act, respectively. The time line is driven by the requirements of these laws.”

“Q: Why is this process going to take so long? DFG has already begun the environmental review necessary to analyze the current regulations; this was last done in 1994. The review process will be complex and lengthy given the statewide scope of the analysis and the time that has passed since the last review. In addition to the detailed written analysis prepared by DFG in coordination with the State Water Board, the review process will also include several opportunities for public involvement, both via public meetings and through solicitation of written comments and suggestions. Initial public meetings to discuss the scope of the environmental analysis are currently being planned for November 2009 in Fresno, Sacramento and Redding. Additional details, including the time and place of the meetings, will be posted on the DFG Web site, www.dfg.ca.gov, as they become available.”

Although the court-ordered review for the EIR is only for the Klamath, Scott, and Salmon Rivers, DF&G will conduct a statewide review for the EIR. DF&G has stated that:
“Based on the information DFG collected from interested parties, DFG informed the Alameda County Superior Court in early 2008 that DFG could not proceed with the court-ordered environmental review in reliance on an addendum to the 1994 EIR. DFG informed the court at the same time that more than minor additions or changes to the 1994 EIR would be necessary and that statewide issues would need to be addressed in a subsequent environmental document in order to fulfill DFG’s obligations under CEQA. As a result, DFG informed the Alameda County Superior Court that it intended to prepare a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report that would be statewide in scope to comply with the December 2006 Court Order.”

55. SB 670 is declared to be an “urgency statute,” and without support of any credible evidence whatsoever, and without the completion of any environmental impact report the legislature:
“finds that suction or vacuum dredge mining results in various adverse environmental impacts to protected fish species, the water quality of this state, and the health of the people of this state, and, in order to protect the environment and the people of California pending the completion of a court-ordered environmental review by the Department of Fish and Game and the operation of new regulations, as necessary, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.”

56. Thus, the legislative finding is dependent upon the completion of an environmental impact review (“EIR”) that is yet to take place, and may never take place. If an EIR ever does take place, it will most likely affirm that not one fish has ever been killed or harmed through present day suction dredge mining; that such mining causes no discernable harm to the natural environment of the water resources of the State of California; and is, in fact, beneficial to the environment and natural resources of the State of California. The purported legislative finding is without basis in fact, and is a political, not a scientific conclusion, and is contrary to the scientific evidence that was available to the legislature.
57. DF&G will not issue refunds for those who have purchased permits prior to the passage of SB 670, since SB 670 does not provide for any such refunds.
58. DF&G has stated that vacuum or suction dredge equipment lawfully placed in the waters of California prior to the passage of SB 670 must be immediately removed pursuant to CF&GC § 5563. No compensation is to be provided by the DF&G or SB 670 to any mining claim owner, miner or prospector for the expense of purchasing such equipment, lawfully placing such equipment in the State’s waters, or having to remove such equipment from the waters.


PARTIES
59. Plaintiff Public Lands for the People, Inc. is a California 501 c-3 non-profit corporation (“PLP”). PLP is a nationwide organization of miners, who are mineral estate grantees, and prospectors. With its constituent members, PLP constitutes approximately 40,000 people. Its founder and President is Gerald E. Hobbs of San Bernardino, California. PLP, has among its membership, miners and prospectors with mining claims and estates in National Forests in California, Federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management in California, National Parks in California, and other Federal lands in California, and throughout the United States. Large numbers of the membership of PLP receive yearly permits from DF&G to engage in vacuum or suction dredge mining in California, and do so engage in such mining in California. These PLP members are directly affected in their mining, prospecting and associated operations by passage of SB 670 that prohibits the issuance of permits for vacuum and suction dredge mining by DF&G, and the cancellation by DF&G of permits already issued, for vacuum and suction dredge mining in California. These PLP members are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
60. Gerald E. Hobbs is a member of, founder, and President of PLP. Mr. Hobbs has mining claims and mineral estates in three National Forests, all of which are in California. They are Angeles National Forest, Tahoe National Forest, and Six Rivers National Forest. Mr. Hobbs has permits from DF&G to engage in vacuum and suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Hobbs has paid DF&G for these permits. These permits are subject to cancellation, and have been cancelled, by DF&G pursuant to SB 670. Mr. Hobbs has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Mr. Hobbs earned income from suction dredge mining in California which was necessary to maintain his economic viability. Mr. Hobbs is directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
61. Patrick Keene is part of a third generation family-owned business that has been serving the mining community in California, the United States, and throughout the world for the past 60 years. Mr. Keene is Secretary/Treasurer of Keene Engineering Co., Inc. (“Keene Engineering”) of Chatsworth, California. Keene Engineering is the largest supplier of small scale dredging and mining equipment in the world. The Company, as well as many other manufacturers, sells to small businesses and dealers who provide equipment to prospectors and miners throughout California and the United States. Many of the people who operate suction dredges come to visit California to dredge for gold and work their mining claims. While doing so, they support local businesses in the process of filling their other needs. Mr. Keene has been working for Keene Engineering for over 30 years. Mr. Keene is a member of PLP. Mr. Keene and Keene Engineering are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
62. The economic impact of the prohibition of suction dredge mining in California is devastating to Keene Engineering. Since the majority of Keene Engineering’s business is in California, it would not allow the Company and the many others small businesses who also sell prospecting and mining equipment or supplies, to survive. Much of Keene Engineering’s business relies on California suction dredge miners. The losses involved with Keene Engineering’s business would be in the many millions of dollars.
63. Since the introduction of SB 670, suction dredge sales by Keene Engineering and its California dealers have stopped. The fear of this activity becoming illegal, and it being a misdemeanor, carrying up to $1,000.00 in fines, and six months in jail, has been devastating to Keene Engineering’s business, as well as its dealers.
64. Forty percent of Keene Engineering’s business is based on equipment sold to small and medium scale suction dredge miners in California, and the people who travel from other states to suction dredge mine in the rivers and streams in California. Thousands of those people also enjoy associated tourism in California and support local seasonal businesses.
65. Most of Keene Engineering’s suppliers, who provided it with components to build suction dredges are profoundly impacted as well. These businesses also have had a substantial drop in their business. The passage of SB 670 has created a ripple effect on many other industries both in and out of the State of California adversely affecting interstate commerce. SB 670’s prohibition on vacuum and suction dredge mining has cost, or will cost, California economic damage in an amount of approximately 60 million dollars a year, and possibly much more.
66. SB 670 will put Keene Engineering out of business. Keene Engineering employs 35 workers. Keene Engineering will lay off approximately 12 employees in an attempt to economically survive. A number of Keene Engineering’s dealers have contacted the Company, and told Keene Engineering that they are closing their doors since they cannot economically survive selling just non-motorized equipment such as sluice boxes and gold pans.
67. The suction dredge community supports many other businesses in gold bearing areas which are in danger of economic failure. Many jobs are being lost due to the loss of tourism that the passage of SB 670 has engendered. Many campgrounds are empty along rivers and mining areas across California. Many businesses are seasonal, including campgrounds, hotels, restaurants, service stations, and grocery stores. Many of these businesses are located in severely economically depressed areas. These business owners rely on small scale suction dredge miners, prospectors, and tourism in order to survive economically. Many of the counties in Northern California, in the gold bearing area, are economically depressed and having very hard economic times. SB 670 is adding to this economic suffering, eliminating jobs, and creating a loss of tax base for these areas and for the State of California.
68. Californians, and people who come from other states to visit California, spend an average of $3,200.00 per month in local economies as of a study made in 1994. In 2009, the amount spent is substantially higher. Californians, and people from other states, purchase special vehicles such as trucks, campers, trailers, quads, and recreational vehicles to prospect and mine for gold in California.
69. Since the passage of SB 670, many mining claim and mineral estates will lose considerable value because their claim owners cannot mine them effectively, and the counties where they are situated will be compelled to reassess the value of their claims. This will create a large loss to County and State tax basis, and will ultimately curtail governmental services.
70. Mr. Keene is also a small scale independent miner who owns mining claims and estates throughout California. Mr. Keene’s mining claims are on Federal land in National Forests in California and on Bureau of Land Management land in California. Mr. Keene engages in vacuum and suction dredge mining in California, and has permits from DF&G allowing him to engage in such mining. Mr. Keene has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Keene has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Mr. Keene supplements his and his family’s income from being able to engage in suction dredge mining. By not being able to engage in suction dredge mining on Federal land in California, Mr. Keene, in his individual capacity, is directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
71. Robert Haiduck is a prospector and miner with mining claims and mineral estates in the Sequoia National Forest, Trinity National Forest, Cleveland National Forest, and other National Forests in California. Mr. Haiduck also has mining claims on federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). Mr. Haiduck is a member of PLP. Mr. Haiduck engages in suction dredge mining on his mining claims in the National Forests in California, as well as, his mining claims on lands administered by BLM. No waters where Mr. Haiduck has mining claims contain any salmon of any species whatsoever. Pursuant to BLM regulations, every ten (10) acres of his unpatented mining claims on BLM land must be sampled for mineral values. Since these claims are on the water, they have to be suction dredged to be correctly and legally sampled. Mr. Haiduck has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Haiduck has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Haiduck has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Haiduck is severely ill. He is financially dependent for the support of himself and his family, which includes three (3) small children, on suction dredge mining on his mining claims in the National Forests and on BLM land in California. Mr. Haiduck and his family have substantial amounts of personal money invested in mining claims that can only be worked feasibly, economically, and in an environmentally friendly manner by suction dredge mining. Without the ability to suction dredge mine Mr. Haiduck and his family stand to lose almost all of their money, and be completely wiped out economically. Being unable to engage in suction dredge mining on his mining claims in the National Forests of California, and BLM land in California, causes immediate and substantial financial harm to Mr. Haiduck and his family. Mr. Haiduck is directly, severely and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
72. Terry Stapp is a 60% disabled Vietnam veteran who retired in 1991 after 25 years in the United States Air Force. Mr. Stapp is a suction dredge miner and has so mined on Federal land in the Downieville area in Sierra County, California for over 30 years. His mining claims and estates in Sierra County are worthless without the ability to engage in suction dredge mining. The economic loss to Mr. Stapp and his wife, Dee, is devastating. Mr. Stapp supplemented his income by suction dredge mining while he was on active duty in the United States Air Force. Since Mr. Stapp retired from the Air Force, suction dredge mining in California is his sole source of income, other than his military retirement pension. Mr. Stapp is directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
73. Dee Stapp is the wife of Terry Stapp. Mrs. Stapp is a member of PLP. Mrs. Stapp has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California. Mrs. Stapp engages in suction dredge mining on her claims in California, and has permits from DF&G to engage in such mining. Mrs. Stapp has paid DF&G for these permits. Mrs. Stapp has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Mrs. Stapp supplements her and her husband’s income through suction dredge mining in California. Mrs. Stapp is directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
74. Mrs. Stapp started a gold prospecting store in San Bernardino, California and has run it since August 1, 1978. Mrs. Stapp sells suction dredges and dredge accessories to miners which represent about 60% of the store’s income. The passage of SB 670 is a devastating economic blow to Mrs. Stapp’s business income. SB 670 has placed in question the economic
viability of Mrs. Stapp’s business, and the ability of her store to remain open.
75. Mrs. Stapp sells the gold she and her husband obtain from suction dredge mining through the Internet throughout the United States and in foreign commerce. The inability to suction dredge mine will substantially impact the Stapps’ financial and economic well-being, since the Internet sales of suction dredge mined gold amounts to many thousands of dollars per year, and is a necessity for the Stapps to financially survive.
76. David DeCosta has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 20 years. Mr. DeCosta is a member of PLP. Mr. DeCosta has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California. Mr. DeCosta has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. DeCosta has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. DeCosta has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. DeCosta and his family. Mr. DeCosta and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
77. James Gregory Lee has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 40 years. Mr. Lee is partially disabled. Mr. Lee is a member of PLP. Mr. Lee has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California. Mr. Lee has permits from DF&G, including an assistant suction dredge permit for an aide to help him operate his suction dredge, due to his disability, in order to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Lee has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Lee has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. Lee and his family. Mr. Lee and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
78. Mike Holt has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 24 years. Mr. Holt is a member of PLP. Mr. Holt has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California in the Tahoe National Forest. Mr. Holt has also engaged in suction dredge mining on private properties, for which he needs permits from DF&G. Mr. Holt has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Holt has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Holt has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided the main source of income for Mr. Holt and his family. Suction dredge mining has allowed Mr. Holt to support his wife and four children, and in these difficult economic times, to continue to help out his children economically. Mr. Holt and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
79. Todd Bracken has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 15 years. Mr. Bracken has been awarded a Certificate of Recognition by the California State Assembly for his mining activities on his family’s historic mining claims, and his use and popularization of California gold throughout the world in his artistic creations. Mr. Bracken is a member of PLP. Mr. Bracken has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California on the Yuba River. Mr. Bracken has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Bracken has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Bracken has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. Bracken and his family. Mr. Bracken takes much of the gold he obtains from suction dredge mining and uses it to make fine jewelry. Mr. Bracken sells that jewelry throughout the United States and in foreign commerce. This involves many thousands of dollars in sales per year. Mr. Bracken maintains a website advertising his jewelry for sale. That website states that Mr. Bracken sells natural California gold jewelry. California gold commands a higher price in the market place because of its natural purity and the history of gold mining associated with California. The prohibition of suction dredge mining in California dramatically and drastically affects Mr. Bracken’s mining and jewelry business, and its economic viability. Mr. Bracken and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
80. Shannon Poe is suction dredge miner in California. Mr. Poe is a member of PLP. Mr. Poe has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California, including National Forest and Bureau of Land Management lands in California. Mr. Poe has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Poe has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Poe has spent over $27,000.00 since January 1, 2009 in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. Poe and his family. Mr. Poe and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
81. David Richard has been a suction dredge miner in California for over 20 years. Mr. Richard is a member of PLP. Mr. Richard has mining claims and estates on Federal land in California. Mr. Richard has permits from DF&G to engage in suction dredge mining in California. Mr. Richard has paid DF&G for these permits. Mr. Richard has spent substantial sums in order to engage in suction dredge mining. Suction dredge mining has provided additional income for Mr. Richard and his family. Mr. Richard and his family are directly and substantially financially harmed by the passage of SB 670.
82. Defendant State of California is a State of the United States, one of whose agencies is the California Department of Fish and Game (“DF&G”).
83. Defendant Arnold Schwarzenegger is the Governor of the State of California, and is sued in his official capacity as Governor.
84. The California Department of Fish and Game is a department of the Executive Branch of the State of California, and among its other duties, is responsible for the issuing of permits for vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within California.
85. Defendant Donald Koch is Director of the California Department of Fish and Game, and is sued in his official capacity as Director of the aforesaid Department.
86. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants DOE 1 through DOE 20 are unknown to Plaintiffs at this time, who therefore sue said Defendants by such fictitious names and will ask leave of Court to amend this Complaint to show their true names and capacities when the same are ascertained. Said Defendants are sued as principals and/or agents, servants, and employees of said principals, and all of the acts performed by them as agents, servants, and employees were performed within the course and scope of their authority and employment. Each of the Defendants is in some way responsible for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiffs.
87. At all times herein, all named Defendants and Defendants DOES 1 though 20 inclusive, and each of them, were the agents and employees of each of the remaining Defendants and were at all times acting within the purpose and scope of said agency and employment and each Defendant ratified and approved the acts of its agent.


CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
COUNT I: Preemption and the Supremacy Clauses
88. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 87 of this Complaint.
89. The heaviest concentrations of placer gold and other valuable minerals on unpatented mining claims held under Federal law, and on unclaimed Federal lands open to mining, are in waterways where a natural concentration of gold and other valuable minerals is in the gravels and on or near the bedrock of the riverbed or streambed. The only viable, economic and environmentally sound manner to recover the placer gold under these conditions is through use of a suction dredge. Suction dredge mining is the highest and best use for placer mining claims. Miners and prospectors have a federally granted right to use such waters in order to develop their mining claims and mineral estates. 16 U.S.C. § 481 (Use of Waters). All state laws, or regulations, in conflict with this right, are void and of no effect. 43 CFR § 3809.3.
90. Miners and prospectors have a statutory right, not a privilege, to go upon open Federal public domain lands for mineral prospecting, exploration, and development. Administrators may not unreasonably restrict the exercise of that right. The Federal Mining Law of 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. § 21 et seq.), provides that all valuable mineral deposits in lands belonging to the United States shall be free and open to exploration and development. The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2, further provides that “the laws of the United States . . . shall be the supreme law of the land . . . with anything in the laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding”. Article IV, § 3, of the United States Constitution, provides that “Congress shall have the power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States.” The absolute prohibition of SB 670 of vacuum or suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways for Federal mining claims within Federal lands in the State of California, directly conflicts with those Federal mining laws, and violates the Supremacy Clause and Article IV, § 3, of the United States Constitution.
91. Plaintiffs are entitled to secure the necessary permits to conduct vacuum or suction dredge mining operations on Federal lands, and the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within those Federal lands, pursuant to, and including, without limitation, the Mining Acts of 1866 and 1870, the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, 30 U.S.C. § 21a.; the Federal Mining Law of 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. § 21 et seq.); 16 U.S.C. § 481, (Use of Waters); the Stock Raising Homestead Act of 1916 (Ch. 9, 39 Stat. 862, codified at 43 U.S.C. § (1976); the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (“FLPMA”) 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., including without limitation §§ 1732(b), 1761 and 1769; the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”); 16 U.S.C. § 1600 et seq. (1976); Multiple Surface Use Sustained Yield Act (“MUSYA”); 16 U.S.C. § 528 et seq. (1960); Multiple Surface Use Act, 30 U.S.C. §§ 612, 613, 615; Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132; 5 U.S.C. §§ 601, 602, 603(b), Regulatory Flexibility Act As Amended By The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996; 5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808) [SBREFA]; the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.); and numerous sections of the Code of Regulations (“CFR”), including without limitation, 36 CFR 228 et seq.; 36 CFR 261 et seq.; 43 CFR § 3800; 43 CFR § 3809.1 et seq., including without limitation, 43 CFR § 3809.3. Thus, SB 670’s absolute prohibition of vacuum or suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within those Federal lands violates Plaintiffs’ rights pursuant to the aforesaid statutes, rules, and regulations mandated by Congress.
92. SB 670 is prohibitory, not regulatory, in its fundamental character. It strikes at the central purpose and objectives of the applicable Federal law regarding mining. Through SB 670, the State of California attempts to substitute its political judgment for that of Congress. The Federal government has authorized a specific use of Federal lands for mining, and California cannot prohibit that use either temporarily or permanently.
93. Vacuum and suction dredge mining is the only practical way any of the Plaintiffs can economically mine the valuable mineral deposits located in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within Federal lands in California. SB 670 is a de facto prohibition on all such mining. To the extent DF&G may issue permits, plaintiffs are entitled to secure the necessary permits to conduct vacuum and suction dredge mining operations on Federal and non-Federal lands within the State of California pursuant to, and including without limitation, the above-stated statutes and regulations. Thus, SB 670’s absolute prohibition of vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within Federal and non-Federal lands, violates Plaintiffs’ rights thereto. SB 670 directly conflicts with Federal law relating to mining, and stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment of the full purposes and objectives of Congress in enacting not only the mining laws but all other laws stated above. All matters dealt with by SB 670 are preempted and fully occupied by the laws of the United States, including without limitation, its mining laws, its environmental laws, its laws relating to clean water, 33 U.S.C. § 1151, et seq. (2004), and its laws relating to endangered species, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531, et seq. (2004).
94. The issuance of a permit for vacuum or suction dredge mining to a mining claim owner, miner and/or prospector by DF&G is a non-discretionary act, and not a discretionary act. The mining laws, as set forth above, give to the miner and/or prospector an absolute and exclusive right to enter and use the Federal public lands, and the rivers, streams, lakes and waterways running therein, for the purpose of mining and developing his or her mineral estate. The Mining Act of 1866 states:
“That the mineral lands of the public domain, both surveyed and unsurveyed, are hereby declared to be free and open to exploration and occupation by all citizens of the United States, and those who have declared their intention to become citizens, subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by law, and subject also to the local custom or rules of miners in the several mining districts, so far as the same may not be in conflict with the laws of the United States.”



COUNT II: Deprivation of Property and Due Process
95. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 94 of this Complaint.
96. Prior to the passage of SB 670, plaintiffs invested many thousands of dollars in order to be able to engage in vacuum and suction dredge mining. Plaintiffs obtained Federal mining claims, invested substantial sums in those claims, kept those claims current, paid taxes on those claims, bought and sold equipment, paid permit fees to DF&G, and otherwise spent substantial sums of money for the purpose of conducting mineral exploration and development pursuant to the laws of the United States and the State of California.
97. The due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Article I § 7(a) of the Constitution of California, prohibit the deprivation of property without due process of law. The Plaintiffs have constitutionally protected property rights and mineral estates that they own or lease in California. The passage of SB 670 makes such property and mineral estates worthless or near worthless. The State of California, through
and by the passage of SB 670, has wrongfully taken plaintiffs’ property without compensation in violation of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California.
98. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, have deprived the Plaintiffs of their property rights without procedural due process of law in at least the following ways:
a. Failing to give the Plaintiffs notice and an opportunity for a hearing prior to the deprivations; and
b. Failing to provide a mechanism for the Plaintiffs to contest the deprivations of their property rights once they occurred.
99. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, have deprived the Plaintiffs of substantive due process under the 5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States and Article I § 7(a) and Article I §§ 7(a) and 19 of the Constitution of California in at least the following ways:
a. Defendants’ deprivations of Plaintiffs’ property rights are arbitrary and capricious;
b. SB 670 has no rational relationship to any legitimate public purpose; rather it was motivated solely by the improper political purpose of totally prohibiting vacuum or suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California;
c. SB 670 singles out Plaintiffs for extraordinary treatment different from that accorded to all other potential mineral developers that utilize different methods of mining, or use suction dredge equipment for extensive non-mining purposes. These extensive non-mining purposes have the same effect as suction dredge mining for minerals, and in many cases, far exceed any disturbance to the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California, and the biota therein, allegedly caused by suction dredge mining;
d. SB 670 is in direct conflict with the laws of the United States, which state that the mining of minerals on and within Federal lands is necessary for the economic development and security of the United States.
e. SB 670 is in direct conflict with the laws of the State of California, which assert that mining of minerals within the State is necessary for the economic development of the State and Nation;
f. SB 670 contains no standards to apply in that it affects every river, stream, lake, and waterway in California whether or not there are any fish, aquatic life, or biota therein, or any living organism that could possibly be affected in any way whatsoever by vacuum or suction dredge mining; and
g. SB 670 is in direct conflict with the encouragement of mining, including vacuum or suction dredge mining by and in the State of California, as being essential to the economic well-being of California, its people, and the needs of society. Thus, Defendants deprivation of Plaintiffs’ property is manifestly unfair, given that the Plaintiffs, with the State of California’s encouragement, have made a substantial investment for the exploration and development of minerals through suction dredge mining.
///
///

COUNT III: Denial of Equal Protection
100. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 99 of this Complaint.
101. The Plaintiffs are entitled to equal protection under the laws of California pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and Article I § 7(a) of the Constitution of the State of California.
102. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, specifically intended to deny, and have denied, Plaintiffs the same treatment, privileges, and immunities received by all other mine owners and operators, or potential mine owners or operators, that utilize other than vacuum or suction dredge mining methods, or users of vacuum and suction dredge equipment for purposes other than mining within the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California.
103. There is no rational basis for this difference and treatment which has denied Plaintiffs’ equal protection under the laws.


COUNT IV: Taking of Property Without Compensation
104. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 103 of this Complaint.
105. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, have deprived Plaintiffs of their mineral rights and estates within the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California in violation of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States; and Article I § 7(a) and Article I § 19 of the Constitution of California.
106. SB 670 contains no provision for compensating the Plaintiffs for the substantial property deprivations they have suffered, and will suffer, and the defendants have not compensated, nor offered to compensate, Plaintiffs for such deprivation. Defendants have made clear that they do not intend to offer any such compensation.
107. Plaintiffs are entitled to just compensation for their property taken.
108. The Defendants’ actions in preparing, adopting, and implementing SB 670 and other rules and policies that interfere with, and prohibit, the Plaintiffs’ rights to prospect, and to access their mining claims and mineral estates in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California, were without public purpose, and in direct conflict with the laws of the United States. Such actions have caused and will continue to cause immediate, direct, adverse and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs and other miners and prospectors.


COUNT V: Violation of Civil Rights
109. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 108 of this Complaint.
110. Defendants, through the passage of SB 670, have deprived Plaintiffs of their mineral rights, estates, and property within the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California, as well as depriving Plaintiffs of rights, privileges, and immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as well as the Constitution and laws of the State of California, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys’ and experts’ fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
///
///
///

COUNT VI: Violation of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970,
30 U.S.C. § 21a
111. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 110 of this Complaint.
112. The Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, 30 U.S.C. § 21a, declares that it is the continuing policy of the Federal Government to foster and encourage private enterprise in the development of a stable domestic minerals industry and the orderly and economic development of domestic mineral resources. This act includes all minerals, including sand and gravel, geothermal, coals, and oil and gas. 30 U.S.C. § 615 prohibits the interference, limitation, or restriction of any existing rights to any Federal mining claimant holding a valid mining claim on Federal lands.
113. SB 670 hinders the national policy as expressed by Congress to foster and develop mining and mineral resources. The actions of Defendants as set forth above, in closing and prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways within Federal lands in California violates the policy of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act as set forth above.
114. Defendants’ actions were in direct violation of Congressional intent and purpose as set forth above, and an abuse of Plaintiffs’ rights. These actions of Defendants have caused, and will continue to cause, immediate, direct, adverse, and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs, other miners and prospectors, and the United States, as well as the State of California.
///
///
///

COUNT VII: Violation of 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54 (Mining Act)
115. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 114 of this Complaint.
116. 30 U.S.C. § 22 states that: “Except as otherwise provided, all valuable mineral deposits in lands belonging to the United States, both surveyed and unsurveyed, shall be free and open to exploration and purchase, and the lands in which they are found to occupation and purchase, by citizens of the United States and those who have declared their intention to become such, under regulations prescribed by law, and according to the local customs or rules of miners in the several mining districts, so far as the same are applicable and not inconstant with the laws of the United States”. 30 U.S.C. § 615 prohibits the interference, limitation, or restriction of any existing rights of any mining claimant holding a valid mining claim on Federal lands.
117. The lands of the United States cannot be free and open to exploration if the historical means of development and utilization by prospectors and miners can be prohibited by SB 670’s prohibitions and closures, either temporarily or permanently, in an attempt to substitute any other judgment for that of Congress. SB 670 is prohibitive and not merely regulatory.
118. The actions of SB 670 as set forth above in closing and prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining to prospecting and developing of mining claims in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California within Federal lands violates the purpose of the aforesaid Act.
119. Defendants’ actions in violating 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54 (Mining Act) were in direct violation of Congressional intent and purpose as set forth above, and an abuse of Plaintiffs’ rights. These actions have caused and will continue to cause, immediate, direct, adverse, and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs, other miners and prospectors, as well as citizens of the United States who wish to become prospectors and miners.

COUNT VIII: Violation of Plaintiffs’ Implied Rights to Use Public Lands
120. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 119 of this Complaint.
121. The mining laws, and other statutes enacted by Congress, granting the right to prospect and mine on the public lands throughout the Western United States, including California, as well as the granting of mining claims and mineral estates to Plaintiffs, and other miners and prospectors, implies a right of access to the minerals therein accompanying the grant, arising out of the rules and customs of prospectors and miners to use such methods as are available for prospecting and mining on Federal lands, and to access their mining claims and mineral estates in an unimpeded manner. Closure by SB 670 to vacuum and suction dredge mining on the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California within Federal lands adversely and unlawfully interferes with their implied right, causing them harm and damages.
122. The actions of SB 670, as set forth above, in closing and prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining or prospecting and developing of mining claims in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways of California within Federal lands violates the aforesaid implied right of Plaintiffs. Therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to an order quieting title to their mining claims and mineral estates, including their right to use vacuum and suction dredge mining in prospecting on Federal lands, and developing their aforesaid mining claims and mineral estates. 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a).
123. The Defendants’ actions in preparing, adopting and implementing the proposed closure and prohibition, and other rules and policies that interfere with the Plaintiffs’ implied right were in unlawful derogation of Plaintiffs’ rights. Such actions have caused and will continue to cause immediate, direct, adverse and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs, and other miners and prospectors.


COUNT IX: Unlawful Interference with Commerce
124. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 123 of this Complaint.
125. Plaintiffs are small business entities that engage in interstate and foreign commerce. The Federal government encourages and favors small business entities. It has established the Small Business Administration to assist such entities, and has passed special laws, rules, and regulations favoring and protecting small business entities. Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. § 603(b) as amended by The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Of 1996) 5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808.
126. The Plaintiffs sell or buy valuable minerals obtained through vacuum or suction dredge mining in California on federal lands. Plaintiffs sell such minerals throughout the United States and in foreign commerce. Plaintiffs also use such minerals obtained from federal lands in the manufacture of valuable products that are sold throughout the United States and in foreign commerce.
127. Many citizens of other States and foreign countries come to California in order to engage in vacuum and suction dredge mining for valuable minerals. These non-California citizens purchase permits from DF&G in order to engage in vacuum or suction dredge mining.
128. The total amount of money spent and invested by these mining claim owners, prospectors and miners in suction dredge mining amounts to many millions of dollars each year. The Plaintiffs, and other prospectors and miners, including non-citizens of California, as set forth above, engage in these activities that are specifically authorized, protected, and encouraged by Congress. The Plaintiffs, and other prospectors and miners, including non-citizens of California, engage in interstate and foreign commerce, as set forth above, such interstate and foreign commerce being specifically authorized, protected, and encouraged by Congress.
129. Plaintiffs, and other persons, as set forth above, spend many millions of dollars each year on goods, services, equipment, food, and other supplies both in and out of the State of California in order to engage in suction dredge mining within the State of California.
130. SB 670, by imposing a total prohibition on suction dredge mining in the State of California constitutes an impermissible burden on interstate and foreign commerce in direct
violation of the Constitution of the United States, Article I, § 8, and in direct conflict and in direct violation of the intent and purpose of Congress.
131. Defendants’ actions constituting an undue burden on domestic and foreign commerce are in violation of the Constitution of the United States, Article I, § 8, and are in violation of Congressional intent and purpose as set forth above, and an unlawful derogation and prohibition of Plaintiffs’ rights. These actions have caused, and will continue to cause, immediate, direct, adverse, and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs, non-citizens of California, other miners and prospectors, and citizens of the United States who wish to become prospectors and miners.


COUNT X: Injunctive Relief
132. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 131 of this Complaint.
133. Plaintiffs request injunctive relief, since the harm to them from the actions of the Defendants in enacting and implementing SB 670 prohibits them from prospecting and accessing their mining claims and mineral estates in the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways in California within Federal lands. This causes damage to them which is immediate and irreparable, because they must be able to use vacuum and suction dredge methods of mining and prospecting in order to feasibly and economically prospect and mine on their mining claims and mineral estates.
134. The actions of the Defendants as set forth above in closing and prohibiting vacuum and suction dredge mining and prospecting and developing of their mining claims and mineral estates causes Plaintiffs irreparable harm and entitles them to immediate injunctive relief.
135. The Defendants’ actions in preparing, adopting and implementing the closure, prohibition, and other rules and policies that interfere with the Plaintiffs’ rights to prospect, and to access their mining claims and mineral estates as set forth above, are in derogation of Plaintiffs’ rights. Such actions by Defendants have caused, and will continue to cause, immediate, direct, adverse and irreversible harm to Plaintiffs and other miners and prospectors.
136. Plaintiffs are entitled to an immediate injunction, including, without limitation, a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and permanent injunction, enjoining and restraining Defendants from the implementation and enforcement of SB 670, and enjoining and restraining Defendants from interfering with Plaintiffs’ rights to prospect, to access and develop their mining claims and mineral estates, as set forth above, through all lawful means, including, without limitation, motorized mining methods such as vacuum and suction dredging, or by other lawful means.
///

COUNT XI: Damages
137. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 136 of this Complaint.
138. As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid violations by Defendants as set forth in Counts I – X of this Complaint, Plaintiffs have suffered present and future damages in an amount not presently ascertainable, the exact amount to be proven at trial.


DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully pray that this Court:
1. Adjudge and declare that the challenged prohibition and closure of the rivers, streams, lakes, and waterways in California is unlawful pursuant to all the acts, laws, and regulations as set forth in Counts I – XI of this Complaint, and that Defendants have acted beyond the scope of their legal authority in adopting those actions, and that such actions violate the Constitution of the United States, and the State of California as set forth above;
2. Enjoin and restrain Defendants, their agents, employees, successors, and all persons acting in concert or participating with them, from enforcing or implementing, and requiring others to enforce or implement, the aforesaid prohibition and closure and related rules, regulations, and polices; and issue a temporary, preliminary and/or permanent injunction against Defendants pursuant to Rule 65, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
3. Declare unlawful and set aside SB 670, as being in violation of the Constitution of the United States,and the laws of the United States, as well as the Constitution of the State of California;
4. Issue and order quieting title to Plaintiffs’ mining claims and mineral estates by determining Plaintiffs’ aforesaid property is benefited by an implied right to use vacuum and suction dredge mining in order to prospect on Federal lands and develop Plaintiffs’ mining claims and mineral estates.
5. Grant such damages as are proven at trial, with interest on the damages at the maximum annual rate as allowed by law, from such earliest date as allowed by law;
6. Award the Plaintiffs their reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including expert costs, and expenses of litigation as allowed by law, including, without limitation, and as applicable, the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 241, et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1988, California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5, the common fund doctrine, and other applicable laws, concepts or doctrines, whether legal or equitable, rules of Court, or other rules and regulations; and
7. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper, including an award of attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses.

Dated: September 14, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID YOUNG
By /s/ David Young David Young
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Last Updated ( Thursday, 14 January 2010 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Sponsored Links

World Gold Price

[www.kitco.com]
ks pharmacy thailand pharmacy cheapest reviews 24 hour candian pramcy antabuse prescription low cost tadapox tadalafil+dapoxetine pharmacyrxone spanish pharmacy online viagra samples free russian pharmacy vermox 100mg reviews mauritius pharmacy online bactrim ds from canada buy antibiotics with paypal how to buy letrozole best viagra in india for men cvs pharmacy job application non prescription xanax canada 25mg generic viagra obat vibramycin mtabs cialis over the counter clomipramine bystolic without prescription cheap protonix very buy jumex online cheap drugs online nizoral tablets canada can i legally buy canadian drugs ivermectin bay viagra uk best drugstore foundation for dry skin canadian online pharmacy shuddha guggulu ordering capsules periactin for weight gain antibiotics on line priority delivery female viagra pill vigora 50 how to use in hindi prednisone with no rx generic calendar clock cialis generique tadalafil how can i get lopressor long does canadian pharmacy genuine viagra professional viagra next day budesonide ec 3 mg price aciclovir compresse buy online drugs without perscription harga nizoral tablet walmart prescription expense report hydrocodone 5-500 street value viagra online from india buy buspar with discover card cheapest price on nolvadex egypt nicotinell non perscription mircette without a prescription free samples of cialis malegra fxt plus reputable online indian pharmacies prescription fertility pills for men stendra cost per pill kamagra oral jelly india buying dutasteride norco cheap crestor bill without prescription arimidex online order can you generic zetia release date want to buy furismide pharmacy4you lady era pills reviews nolvadex canada bupropion online purchase viagra online pay with check european pharmacy buy viagra canada viagra liquid clomide pakistan buy viramune the counter vigara desde canada flomax for sale does levitra expire viagra online canadian pharmacy scoria incorporation india viagra keftab cheapest price ebay calis on line pharmacy potenzmittel ohne rezept ranitidine buy online for sale wholesale cialis paid with paypal can i buy antabuse over the counter tadalafil kaufen paypal online pharmacy no prescription haldol viagra in aereo forum meclizine cheapest price germany approved european online pharmacy buy ventolin in uk valacyclovir hcl tabs rayh health care where to buy luvox pills tadalafil generic best prices discount professional viagra baclofen erowid prednisolone generic name amantadine for dogs cialis 50 cialis generico en chile list of online pharmacy in india nympho max pill in india viagra on line no script prednisone bupropion generic equivalent hydrochlorothiazide sale in canada overnight shipping on viagra pills donde comprar prilogy en usa generic crestor order diovan over the counter viagra mit ec karte kaufen xanax from canada cheap viagra in bangkok how can i get augmentin zoloft flomist nasal spray pr... buy antibiotics in canada buy nitroglycerin ointment online testosterone cream for men healthy man generic viagra suppliers canada drugstore online cialis 2 day delivery belgium viagra alli tabs uk buy straterra online how can i get rocaltrol you feel pharmacy2u cialis on sale online mastercard all day chemist retin a cheapest price on myambutol cash where to buy brand viagra female viagra pills canadian pharmacy erythromycin finasteride 5 mg prices buying precription drugs online generic viagra mastercard accepted cialis sublinguale 100 mg viagra prices buy hydrocodone cough syrup online take lamisil with juice drink buy motilium in canada buy cheap ciplox 500 mg no precription viagra super cialis order cialis non branded renagel m?xico can you buy sildenafil over the counter adalat oros buy synthroid usa how long after stopping tamoxifen can i get pregnant zithromax with out perscription kamagra oral jelly singapore cialis 100mg preis online canadian phar first time whats cialis use retina a without precription cialis soft tabs dosage generic ayurslim testimonial tadalafil us buy vigara online how can i get robaxin look branded viagra online online pharmacy with overnight delivery does indomethacin contain sulfa buy adderall xr 30 mg in uk can i buy aspirin over the counter in uk cheap lynoral pills to get me hard children;s singulair over the counter vigrande kaufen ed trial pack without a prescription bupropion 300 mg no prescription celebrex and weight gain metothraxate online amitriptyline, overnight, no rx where can i buy methotrexate buy generic cialis professional cipla finpecia sex pills for women canadian rx propecia product cardinal wholesale online viagra review kamagra romania cum while sleep what is the quickest way to get viagra generic cialis ranbaxy where to buy cabgolin tablet us overnite pharmacy cialis cost walmart dr edward b armington albuterol nebulizer frequency generic advair release date doxy cialis lily brand soft tabs lowest price for bystolic levitra with out prescription tadalafil 20mg best price cialis commercial song pharmacy world levitra withouth prescription want to order viagra cialis online nizagara review viagra price per pill robaxin non perscription inhaler provera women viagra shop cost of cialis walmart buy valtrex cheap buy cialis in ireland howtobuyjanuviaincanada generic prazosin whats ginette-35 buy online uk tadalafil cheap metformin generic purchase rxrelief discount card zyrtec canadian pharmacy sex store cialis roaccutan usa buy on line pharmacys in india levitra bestellen clomiphene citrate for men obat neurontin order lasix no prescription ampicillin 500 mg cheap online meds with no prescription 5mg cialis 360 day supply stendra online purchase amitriptyline buy in uk buying real viagra how can i get detrol until metronodizole discount buying disulfiram abortion pill fast delivery hong kong viagra buy buy triam 37.5 no prescription order clomid from india online order sarafem mail altace sale uk prescription for cipro viagra with no pre online prescriptions canada buy amoxicillin without prescription uk no prescription india viagra coupons from pfizer carafate next day delivery uk no rx abilify where to buy proair hfa inhaler list of reputable online pharmacies zoloft medication articulo 122 rmc lahaie cialis 20mg longtimesex 150mg viagra ed cream trileptal speedial how can i get ginette 35 increase breast size levitra cheapest price dubai buy cheap generic drugs free hydrochlorothiazide online bestellen farmacia online cialis contrave ordering thyroxine online zyvox sales abilify lowest price medication cialis recomended extra dose buying toradol in usa buy pink viagra cialis black market i get penicillin from mexico hydrea cailis over night deiieving flovent propylene glycol where to buy teracycline pharmacy online atarax world select pharmacy review order cabgolin online delivery generic coreg generic elocon-over-the-counter ospedale sacco milano order unisom online video buy cheap elimite online cafergot availability bull 100 viagra gold viagra kanguro fungsi tablet danazol malegra tablets my canadian awc drugstore practice test for pharmacy tech doxycycline from canada pharmacy tretinoin cream buy uk raloxifene hydrochloride where to buy what is the shelf life of prednisone sildenafilo sandoz 100mg genuine viagra horhy pakistah avalide non perscription xanex trimix gel wholesale generic zoloft hair loss isotretinoin gel buy cialis 20mg australia tadalafil italiano order pfeifer brand viagra online buy propecia canada tadalafilo spedizione sicura ordine viagra brand cialis for 3.92 us online cialis 20mg uk mgrxpharmacy la pillola cialis con ritardante aricept lowest price costco chloramphenicol order pharmacy supply at cheap cialis buy cefixime online in a single dose kamagra from india ordering seroquel medication sumycin sale uk buy prescription worm medication alesse birth control sale online pharmacy india legal how lotensin works echeck pharmacy how can i get methotrexate quickly does naquadem kaufen buy generic cialis mastercard soft generic viagra usa brittle asthma life expectancy lozol for sale online viagra tables for sale australia propecia for sale mebendazole over the counter canada cheap viagra overnight buy lisinopril 10 mg without receipt xlpharmacy canada isoniazid cheapest price xbox clomiphene citrate 50mg for men potassium viagra how long rxlivehelp cheapest price on midamor buy finasteride online australia cheep no prescription cialis cheap viagra japan vegalis cialis 5mg price where to buy cabergoline alternative medicines for bactrim synthroid testosterone booster for sale brand name viagra on line order atorlip wholesale generic crestor grapefruit organique acai berry price prescription drugs medicines fda order rhinocort vidal cialis dosage 5mg canadaian pharmacy for nizagara where to buy viagrain ireland is neurontin an opiate like lortab online drugstore how can i get orlistat raspberry ketones uk ritalin buy online onlie pharmacy with echeck uk poosi clips levitra trial offer how good is lavitra active plus reviews buy penegra india viagra next day shipping tynidazole without prescription lysto sildenafil spray amantadine sulfate order viagra usa pharmacy proventil for sale viagra jelly for sale uk viagra scaduto buy cialis 40 mg paypal buycheapviagrausa viagra_gratisprobe professional cialis reviews generic for albenza how to buy flagyl 500 mg where to buy prazosin uk buy clomid online zest creative online indian propecia canada pharmacy pay with paypal januvia 100 siligra how can i get micardis buy universal drugstore canada pharmacy buy cheap exelon yahoo strattera online order safe proscar online pharmacy generic levitra no prescription propecia pro pack prices suhagra-100 levitra precio stratera order online cost of viagra at cvs buy diabecon review sildenafil 100 cheap viagra from india overniight meds buy doxepin from a usa pharmacy pletal non perscription walmart best life rx medications viagra 100 mg pills where to buy orlistat cheap buy fucidin cream online www pakistan sex com fake birth control pills for sale flagyl 500mg without perscription viagra non prescription safe sites zyprexa generic brand atorvastatin calcium buy fucidin cream no prescription tadalafil 20mg olmesartan mifepristone price in south africa arimidex sale ritalin fucidin cream buy tetracycline buy online eye ointment for cats purchase biaxin acheter diprosone safe viagra on the web buy requip online in us canadian pharmacy finast fitta levitra generika kaufen is proscar good for hair buy felodipine how to buy cialis cheap actoplus met in europe qsymia no prescription online buy generic cialas on line punar vivah desi tashan cialis generico inghilterra buy lasik water pills 80 mg syrup augmentin duo where to buy prazosin cheap where to buy viagra online forum gonorrhea medication online whexenical no prior prescritption buy canadian lorazapam does viagera help women cialis in south africa viamedic medications generic lincocin lincomicina wellbutrin online without rx comprar viagra americano buy actors online full episodes ebay tractors vipps online pharmacy viagra viramune buy cheap and genericsleeping pill purchase medicine online prescription sildenafil citrate india finasteride buy cheap copegus real lisinopril pfizer viagra cheap generic sildenafil capsules brand name cialis how much trazodone will get you high will viagra make me last longer purchase drugs online how to order prednisone 10 mg lamisil 1 online ed meds canada pharmacy on line cialis 200mg buy cheap triamterene a prescription cialis bestellen isoretinoin without prescription retin a best price cheap cialis viagra levitra pack online mexico care pharmacy pharmacy without dr prescriptions pfizer viagra without prescription can i order penicillin online best price cialis online health canada drug product database the 7 second pill cialis for cheaper mestinon buy online real sildenafil hangi bitkilerde bulunur universal pharmacy online alli slimming pills cheapest price ubat metronidazole 200mg cealis 30 tablet trial arimidex fast delivery cialis e-shops europe antabuse 200mg online discount brandedcialis online cialis for daily use online super calcium carbonate ca 8000 non prescription pharmacies mexico sildenafil citrate tablets for sale flovent buy online mims vand cialis can ciprofloxacin be used for chlamydia bartell drugs sildenafil citrate msds canadian pharmacy tampa topomax without a script zoloft require prescription in canada rx pharmacy one how can i get proscar loss cialis online buy viagra without seeing a doctor how to buy zenegra in uk sex tablets name over the counter indometrhacin bbg accutane best site to buy viagra in australia canadian pharmecy price of janumet mexico cialis no brasil mastercard overnight prescription antibiotics pills to get pregnant over the counter how can i get rosuvastatin calcium work noble drugs online drugstore canada phamacy nizagara vs viagra cheap non prescription finasteride 5mg over the counter antibiotics buy cefixime online no prescription part d covering cialis for prostrate is effexor available in the philippines buy cheap flovent hfa online novolog flexpen cost without insurance how can i get isoniazid buspar purchase seroquel 300 mg street value cialis 100 usa meds online review buy proscar buy generic floxin drug cipla product list para que sirve el clorfenamina lanoxin over the counter available risperidal without prescription how to get viriga buy valtrex in canada wholesale viagra 100mg como comprar en ebay desde chile prescriptionless cytotec cailis canada best anxiety medication for women wholesale generic pariet vidal buy alli online uk in stock remeron next day delivery xend healtyman lowes online price for cialis doxycycline online order propecia on the phone order vigrande 50mg non precription viagra from canada no scrip protonix vermox europe buy elocon cream no prescription cheap female viagra online nz cialis generika per nachnahme bestellen erection pills that work can you order propecia online online pharmacy for women sex pills alli buy ciplactin best online cialis branded viagra for sale how can i get mentax pronounce viagra prijs where can i get colchine order aceon online you canadian pharmacy clozaril registry pariet non perscription insulin prednisone 20mg side effects in dogs shop uroxatral use cheap prescription drug canada aurochem axon rx india pharmacies online 1650 canadian pharmacy online no script viagra kaufen info generic plavix walgreens over the counter celebrex equivalent ambien money pak sildenafil cost doxycycline hyclate 100mg order online viagra fast delivery no prescription how can i get digoxin reduce heart rate pharmacy windsor ontario canada cialis xlpharmacy generic cialis amitriptyline amazon levitra 20mg uk canadian pharmacy that takes mastercard cialis overnight shipping free trial viagra coupon felodipine online canada zocor cheapest price egypt dispensing viagra wholesale generic diflucan infection cyvita vs viagra viagra sex tablet price canadian pharmacy clarinex viagra 800mg reviews get a lavitra script best website to buy viagra where to buy viramune over the counter best place to buy generic viagra uk asthma inhalers for sale murata sacco best place to buy nolvadex online mifepristone buy online uk generic bactrim pill is mobic an over the counter drug order tretinoin 0.1 cream online does viagra lower blood pressure i want to buy viagra online levitra professional no prescription buy brand name wellbutrin xl lithium cheapest price kilogram war on drugs online discount viagra cialis risperdal order flomax cheapest indian prices for nizagara generic cialis rx online viagra overnight shipping caras angola where to buy bactrim antibiotic no prescription zocor where to buy buspar over night elimite rx cefixime online order food permethrin 5 percent (elimite) descargar bot para empire y allies clomiphene online pharmacy store iscover articulo 43 how to spot fake viagra brand cialis search,http,archrestore,index buy amoxil online with examination viagra150mg misoprostol price in south africa how can i get aricept before viagra for men online shopping... unifire viagra online free and fast shipping cialis online in australia buy viagara online no prescription brand online valtrex no prescription best online viagra pharmacy store voltaren gel over the counter buy uroxatral wiki farmacia on line tadalafil mail order pills viagra buying citalopram without prescription viagara shipped without prescription is amoxicillin safe for my dog nolvadex sold in canada drug levitra china sale viagra ad on radio www.rhine inc no rx cialis levitra kamagra 100mg oral jelly srbija levitra online pharmacies where to buy forzest air buy cheap penegra express buy cialis daily suhagra cipla order vytorin online want viagra originale paypal cheapest cialis online comprar propecia lasix from usa withought a prescription how to use cialis for best results bactrim without a prescription indian online pharmacy reviews sex tablet for long time cheap generic abili purchase shuddha guggulu powder is there an alli shortage buy cialis online debit card cialis no prescriptino forum generic levitra england acquisto viagra generico sildenafil citrate on sale propranolol next day delivery quote fastest and best generic pharmacy piracetam where to buy robaxin narcotic revatio musei aperti a natale buy cheap pletal much how can i get fertomid ovulate real pfizer viagra for sale brusing and fluconizole lovegra cipro order for uti brand viagra 100mg vs generic viagara how can i get cialis nhs ed hardy perfume what are the highest mg of cialis cialis jakarta nexium 40 mg online where to buy colchicine amitriptyline purchase online med direct lisinophril without rx cipro online next day air comprar cytotec en zaragoza nicotinic acid percocet canadian pharmacy viagra patent expiration canada amoxicillin 500 mg canadian pharmacy where to buy amaryl xm fluoxetine capsules for sale non prescription cialis 5mg red 7 second pill zinoxime buy alli refill buy maxifort online predizone without a prescribtion cialis pas cher diarex cheapest price where doxycycline next day delivery from:"canadian pharacy" phamacy asda viagra zanaflex online cheap in usa cialis 5mg. from canadian pharmacy cheap non prescription propecia no perscription hydrocodine cialis mail order canada buy clomid uk super avana review buy finasteride 5mg with amex vera pelle safe cialis online pharmacy canada uk cheap kamagra roxithromycin dosage tofranil price y p healthcare erection pills in india motrin 800 over the counter how to order cialis inderal no script why would cialis stop working non prescription indocin ranbaxy caverta azathioprine lerk sildenafil pills cheap prozac no prescription cheap alli buy mitazapine in uk ed supplements overnight cialis in inghilterra free viagra samples canada pills seroquel 300 mg generic medicine of kamagra in malta ce este candibene buy clomid no prescription canada flygyl for racing pigeons long time sex tablets name pomegranate vitamix cialis usa over the counter meds without a percription primatene mist inhaler in canada combivent precio viagra spray is cialis in mexico good ordering cialis online illegal low cost propecia buying viagra in canada what is purmycin used for how can i get diovan you where to buy zocor legal inderal online uk pharmacy finpecia best price cialis and alcohol pharmacy express scam viagra vs proviagra pill identifier with pictures canada generic viagra uk paypal praire rx pflanzliches viagra kaufen cipla brand tadalafil kenacomb lexapro mail order us pharmacy cialis dosering genaric cialis for sale in the usa buying prescription drugs in mexico slimex diet pills for sale where to buy saw palmetto in bangalore world med direct review cialis gratuit onlinepharmacy24 free albuterol inhaler samples mode d'action flagile online viagra surrey buy online viagra usa online perscription for viagra lexapro colombia cialis online purchase cost of cialis at cvs ventolin without prescription canada buy tretinoin cream 0.025 how to control dry cough from coversyl canada pharmacy euro med bestrxonlinepharmacy website buy cheap levitra jelly buy exelon online shareowner levitra wirkung lowest price dapoxetine 30 day cialis 5mg imuran online cheap from canada tadacip paypal world drugstore generic paypal esomeprazole magnesium wholesale generic uroxatral date cialis 5mg kaufen first medicine online pharmacy store sominex buy online application brand name viagra without prescription buy atarax hydroxyzine mexico online no prescription needed ratings benzaclin alternative cheap irbesartan hct generic viagra cialis package pfister viagra how much does cialis for daily use cost is alli back on the market buy valium from indian pharmacist where to buy dianabol online cialis with avodart online gucci store usa albuterol uk online purchase paxil xr billigaste viagra pfizer substitutes for aciphex bystolic canadan provider viagra tablets in bangalore cialis rezeptfrei deutschland lamisil generic for sale cialis for sale glendale ca cheap diet pills without a script abana lowest price list problems with generic plavix reliable viagra site 40 viagra for 99.00 suprax online no prescription lexapro sedation how long secure medical prescription propescia for sale where to buy proscar in singapore tetracycline recall albuterol sulfate .083 price bupropion recreational use shop lexapro amaryllis belladonna pills generic forzest review brand cialis online pharmacy buy proscar online metformin amazon co uk online viagra shipped from the us rxrelief pharmacy card scam 9 combitic global caplet pvt ltd prozac no rx, mastercard online pharmacy with overnight shipping viagra with prescription by doctor bayer levitra online mail quicki.co.za loc:it buy combivent respimat online buy vigra from las vegas lamisil over the counter like buy buspar where to buy triamterene vietnam wholesale generic ranitidine or brand name buy lasix cheap legitimate testosterone healthbuy ayurvedic abortion drug ursodeoxycholic acid cost zithromax kopen zonder recept canadian pharmacy northwest viagra generica generic cialis pills sale acheter alli shallaki lowest price viagra.super.force methotrexate non perscription viable pregnancy how to order metformin c20 without prescription levitra generico where to buy digoxin does viagra (brand) for sale in australia sildenafil citrate 50mg vaiagra vigora 100 hindi zithromax 5 pack arimidex india janivia drugs south america fedex viagra generic allopurinol without prescription decadron no script overnight shipping culturismo bayer20 buy glucophage xr approved viagra store canadian pharmacy viagra offers suboxone on line pharmacy cialis vendita on linea dal canada valtrex for dogs online medicines hyderabad over the counter vermox cheap paxil on line cialis from uk how can i get aldactone stay in body viagra stopped working for me eprostol 200 buy orlistat usa no prescription buy cheap mentat in india genericviagraonlinewithoutrx viagara walgreens different types of cialis cialis for on-line malaysian buyers cialis for daily use best prices hairy calcium carbonate sale japan suhagraat manane ka tarika hindi need synthroid no rx viagra suppository c.o.d. viagra au order viagra online with echeck how does cialis work for bph where can i purchase provera contact 500mg aviane herbal viagra gnc viagra china supplier praziquantel cytotec philippines cialis vs cialis professional generic singulair uk citalopram online where can i buy griseofulvin clonidine 0.2 to buy no prescription how can i get anacin body when will cymbalta become generic closest natural thing to viagra levitra espanol staxyn reviews online tadafilcanada overnight 4u trimetabol buy acivir buy prednisolone tablets 5mg cheap price on clomid shipping india pharmacy cialis imuran online order can u amitriptyline were can i buy them protonix sale online uk cytotec online pharmacy uk buy doxycycline hyc cap 100mg reputable pharmacies in mexico roxithromycin non perscription eyeglasses cialis buy greece how can i get nexium quickly does plavix to refill propecia pills how to order prednisone for a dog cialis prezzi estrogen for sale india online perscriptions birth control online without rx cheap buspar comprare cialis in farmacia cucumber make birth control how can i get aygestin fast does is canadianmeds24h legit wholesale generic levitra professional (vardenafil) amsa fast pills comprar cialis profesional buy tylenol 4 online canada pharmacy 24h buy online cialis viagra professional canada canadian health care mall complaints retin a without a prescription free zoloft with out perscription order celadrin back where can i buy bueprun sildenafil powder in bulk erythromycin cheapest price lotion filling prescription for domperidone sildenafil citrate 100mg lowest price flagyl syrup for children which is better lipitor or vytorin kamagra oral jelly online viamed buy lexapro 20mg no rx pharmacy online europe where can i purchase atarax over counter aldactone lowest price online pharmacy24 pran how much do viagra cost safe buy antibiotics online alli diet pills sale cialis for daily use cost 338 allegra online order form wellbutrin sale australia buy 100mg viagra tablets cheapest price on mevacor dosage buyzanaflexinusa cheapest pharmacy to buy viagra tetracycline online order return viagra and atrial fibrillation where to buy viagra in calgary bystolic and sore throat buying cheap lincocin online order periactin tretinoin over the counter how to get propecia generic costco buy femera fast serophene online cheap outlet buying flouoxetine hydrochloride online prednisone dosage for allergies zovirax overnight online viagra without a prescriptuon elimite cream over the counter alli weight loss amazon cialis united states pharmacy cialis cheap no script zithromax without prescription pharmacy puerto rico buy roxithromycin indication diflucan 150 mg en espanol thailand pharmacies online vt logistics accutane online best price 40 mg provera 5mg online pharmacy baku tamoxifen fast online refill buy pros car precose buy online mexico generic colchicine availability buy zocor online without a prescription reliable propecia online pills24 tinidazole online order food order lovastatin online cheapest place to buy viagra translate google http health search does walmart sell viagra canada pharmacy lithium environmental assessment vendita online intimax100 in italia real propecia australia india meds 4 u real viagra vs generic viagra where can i buy left over clomid order lasix online canadian online pharmacy generics nonprescription robaxin doxycycline cheapest price range abilify online no prescription where can i buy clomid tablets cialis generics sale meds order order submitted hyaluronic acid online order zumiez prednisone tablets fedeltry healthcare viagra tenormin no script over the counter ed pills gasex tablets how to use viagra effectively temovate reputable online pharmacies canada buy fosamax online a prescription nisoprostol online no rx prednisone fda approval advair diskus kamagra 100mg reputable site diazepam soft tabs viagra canadia pharmacy cialis 24 hour pharmacy.eu viagra 100 canada cuepons avodart normopresan side effects safe site to viagra soft purchase flagyl pharmaceutical grade viagra dutasteride how to take tadacip 20 mg viagra in shanghai is prednisone otc in canada montelukast stada 10 mg. foro buy cheap emsam york buy viagra online legally penegra online order pharmacy high off robaxin where to buy 3 10percent cream eurax pcm pharmacy walgreens generic drug list medicine without prescription can i buy viagra in cvs pharmacy how much do 100mg viagra cost 36 shop zoloft side hyaluronic acid sale and pregnancy what drug is similar to stromectol erectile dysfunction vitamin d erythromycin purchase cheap cialis with free shipping prescription medication mexico canadaclaims.ca loc:de buy clonidine no prescription how can i get pletal needed mestinon next day delivery gifts nexium canada compare no prescription order meclizine online kopen titanium dioxide viagra triangle chicago discount medicine canada angela women's ginseng online online viagra in canada misoprostol buy uk want to order prednisone amoxicilina y viagra met 4 mexican pharmacy best online pharmacy no script why is no one selling alli bactrim without a percription doxycycline price walmart cialis and bactrim cialis for daily use 5 mg for sale buy abayas online kamagra (sildenafil citrate) discount canadian pah mylan atorvastatin recall mifepristone and misoprostol buy online pharmacy no prescription seroquel alli next day delivery nyc harga pil cytotec mwtformin for wwight loss in canada over the counter erection pills reviews hyaluronic acid sale dangers tadalafil overnight canadian pharmacy nizoral xampu medicine cialis best sellers catalog 100mm viagra to purchase non presciption indocine erectile function drugs for sale buy cheap rosuvastatin vancouver brand name levitra lisinopril side effects urine odor let me watch this 1 channel thrift shop clean printable lyrics viagraplus no prescription buy liquid cialis lipitor by mail canadian pharmacy chloramphenicol tesco online viagra reviews buy cialis online fed ex shiping suhara cialis buy isoptin gy“ƒgyszer best pharmacy to buy tadalafil xeloda sale in canada viagra price canadian...5mg cialis buy cheap reminyl retard cost for bupropion where to buy arimidex greece cialis online europe trental 400 mg retailer cheap ciales viagra commercial girl gen viagra online cheap generic accutane buy levitra with dapoxetine e 20 tadalifil doxycycline cost walmart levitra sold over the counter viagra cialis levitra lequel choisir where is cheapest place to buy levitra www fast suhagraat com cialis canada prescription trusted online pharmacies no rx needed levitra prezzo in farmacia italia lexapro canada 10 mg wholesale generic propecia for sale buy amoxicillin boots 361 canadian pharamacies viagra forum propecia from canada methotrexate otc psoriasis levothyroxine "mexico" where can you buy aleve d chlamydia antibiotics order on line sildenafil generic canada over the counter medications with aspirin kamagra-100 chewable tablet where to purchase chat lagyl buy lortabs from canada order xenical the pharmacy express review cialis miglior prezzo online in sydney trust-rx direct pharmacy viagra vyvanse street price where can i buy clonidine vancouver generic serevent vs methotrexate from canada epididymitis azithromycin dose one a day pill to help herpes sytems nolvadex for sale pct cheap viagra that works amoxil without a perscription canadian viagra quickest shipping buy citalopram 10mg online uk pristiq online cheap get flagyl forte 500mg how can i get lamisil spray work cialis paiement paypal albuterol online paypal generic viagra from canada walgreens permethrin cream atrovent inhaler generic name orlistat availabilty? cheap coversyl lipitor generic cialis coupons for pharmacy how can i get cialis make you feel buy femara in canada where can i buy clomid in nigeria china drugs canada tadalafila cost of celebrex without insurance express shipping viagra penegra cialis 2 day shipping unisom 2 canada wellbutrin online order rx certified vipps online pharmacies how can i get evista long does cheap viagra in uk kamagra deutschland shop clarinex online order number cipa approved canadian pharmacies where to get vardenafil viagra sales in usa cant access kamagraforyou propecia sellers on line pharmacy amoxicillin 500mg price philippines 36 purchase medication levitra 400 viagra pakistan cheap viagra vipps levitra and norvasc cialis prescription not required minoxidil results after 2 months nuovo cialis trazo done days to get out of system buy viagra online using paypal buy single viagra pills 573 overnight meds no perscription singapore viagra is cytotec over the counter tadalafil without perscription buy olistat online pharmacy in europe purchase alli online today cypli pharmacy taper prednisilone in cats usa drugstore buy zoloft without presecription women for sale pharmacy canada cialis generic viagra for sale in england 400 mg viagra uses for prednisone in humans viagra soft tabs information ondansetron semprot good site to buy viagra valtrax for sale viagra kaufen g??nstig kamagra by ajanta pharma what viagra does 1942 universal drugstore canada where can i purchase lincocin produced buy cialis shoppers drug mart yagara for men women viagra pills online cialis prescription order medrol from turkey cheap viagra rush lowest price viagra buy online fluconazole arimidex for low testosterone how much is lithium without insurance candian rx keppra generic version order gabapentin without prescription where to buy brimonidine tartrate clomid 25mg for men is ordering xanax on ipharmacy legit viagra professional basso costo lung specialist in chennai diovan generic date arthritis hip exerceses crestor dangereux trazodone pills online voltaren lowest price walmart buy cheap adalat cialis professional tadalafil revatio 20 mg my order status info order omnicef online generic buy viagra legally can you take klonopin with phenergan cheap single pills viagra vpxl cheap prices desitashan clomid tablets no perscription buy effexor quick shipping buy norvasc no prescription cialis walgreens price kuala lumpur biagra indocin for sale kamagra online canadian fluconazole no perscription buy benadryl online tablets in australia nexium online australia rocaltrol over the counter available over-the-counter how many trazodone will kill you we're can i buy promethazine codeine slimex sibutramine cialis paypal bezahlen colchicine more drug uses free sample viagra uk desogestrel buycialas in the usa buying viagra with american express calis cialis nolvadex canada supplier grafazol metronidazole z pack for sale tretinoin over the counter canada how can i get ventolin at asda septilin lowest price list augmentin online sale no prescription gabapentin injection generic clarithromycin price india generic drugs online pharmacy order amtriyptline baclofen 20 mg high buy cheap hoodia yemen buy lamictal cheap buy wellbutrin xl no prescription viramune ordering cialis 20mg australia como tomar omifin buy tretinoin in canada go kart go in ipoh mestinon cheapest price sydney meloxicam dose guinea pigs purchase toradol prescription pil perancang yasmin tab omnic0.4mg this for what use lopid next day delivery time buy medication online from ireland risperdal non perscription inhaler discount code for all pills shop quick ship cialis no prescription buy atomoxetine online india 24 hour walmart pharmacy near me side effects of himcocid bystolic lowest price walgreens cost of nexium at costco canada drug pharmacy promo code buy 160 mg viagra tablets prednisone 10 mg for dogs diprosone cream for hair growth cialis 100mg pills buy abortion pill uk cipro antibiotic without prescription canadian drug stores viagra metformin hydrochloride 500 mg price prezzi viagra vagiral dydrogesterone cialis usa online paypal vermox rezeptfrei deutschland paypal canadian pharmacy zyprexa usa where to buy cabgolin genuine obat lansoprazole doxycycline liquidfor sale codeine syrup for sale free shipping liipitor viagra promotion viagra delayed ejaculation canada pharmacy nolvadex for sale free shipping bayer levitra online prednisone trazodone 100mg buy doxycycline online no prescription ciprofloxacino 500 mg dosis purchase viagra discount code for strattera buy viagra amex pharmacycustomercare buy cheap pfizer xalatan sildenafil dapoxetine tablets order alesse without prescription visa viagra patent expires where can i purchase clarinex online cialis tadalafil 40 buy pills without a prescription affordable fenofibrate 160 mg article9 diovan valsartan 40mg does zoloft cause weight gain atarax syrup make viagra at home best generic viagra manufacturers paxil for sale buy exelon online rating 1742 buy tinidazole 500mg where to buy cheap cialis rayh healthcare pvt.. ltd. penispictures anafranil cheapest price increase netherlands online pharmacy nw pharmacy canada prednisone shortage how can i get citalopram effects levlen ed online no prescription cheapest u.k based viagra supplier tadalafil soft gel capsule letrozole for sale healthy man radio ads free valtrex prescriptions how can i get citalopram vitamins purchase amoxicillin trihydrate long time tablets in pakistan glipizide atomoxetine buy online cheapest no prescription prozac cialis sources in canada ginseng prices 2013 clomid perth misoprostol en colombia viagra no prescription online pharmacy euro cialis levitra hong kong cytotec online purchase in singapore cheap celadrin online viagra online paypal payments buy antibiotics from canada online where can u get viagra from thailand online pharmacy cephalexin black market australia levothyroxine to buy online buy cheap generic cialis robaxin india sale of viagra in singapore voltaren 50 mg - london buy acyclovir ireland securetabs propecia cost colchicine low price dose viagra with no subscription erectile dysfunction trial packs cheap celadrin unguent alli direct pharmacy inderal online order rx plendil online without prescription on the everybody is levitra covered calcitriol mail order pharmacy generic cymbalta 2013 pink viagra pills in india rhine iinc where to buy skelaxin united states cialis cost at target how can i get cialis really last non generic cialis online canadian pharmacy no scripts needed alphatrex cream order online. mexico perscriptions from mexico benza clin cream buying misoprostol pill where can i get it how to use penegra 100 otc substitute for prednisone canada rx viagra without prescription mail order celebrex savings flagyl forte 500 mg metronidazole buy epivir hbv dosage buy zestoretic without prescription gris peg price legitimate indian pharmacies propecia coupons from merck getting cialis shipped overnight american pills viagra generic name of prazosin cheap online levitra meloxicam obat apa wholesale generic serophene wiki mifepristone online in south africa bd himcolin gel how to use video over the counter substitute for neurontin cialis italia gratis hyzaar lowest price list renova cream long time sex tables viagra professional difference how can i get levitra does accutane buy uk tadalafil quick delivery viagra_rezeptfrei_paypal_bezahlen buy azitromyicin how can i get premarin a prescription rumalaya online order buy lunesta online decadron injection fluoxetine lowest price canada eutirox perisonse wiothout a script canada gold vigra review question auto canadian prescriptions enbrel equivalents order plendil get cialis without presecription legal viagra on line discount kamagra pharmacy how much does it cost for amo... generic claritin at cvs lamisil pills no prescription buy cheap cafergot singapore lasix for sale cialis cheap online baclofen fedex overnight shipping buy cialis online canada pharmacy where can you buy periactin buy avodart online canada flovent no prescription online pharmacy lamisil online order cream buy flovent online no prescription viagra for sale in ontario free viagra from gibraltar amitriptyline tablets to buy caberoline for sale how much is zoloft without insurance buy workout equipment with echeck canada pharmacies online how long does viagra work how much is flagyl at walmart best online pharmacy with cod suprax next day delivery times levitra maximum dosage damiana e coumadin discount neurontin uses buy anastrozole no prescription cheapviagrawithamastercard vigora benzthiazide and triamterene buy lopressor online you viagra 25mg vs 50mg store.generic vendita viagra originale line where to buy cialis generic buspar whats canadian pharmacy serpina cialis generika schweiz buy cytotec online canadianfarmaci t.plavix health viagra doxycycline hyclate vs monohydrate cialis in hyderabad aciphex prescription discount card get nizoral tablets online purchasing estrogen pills online canada pharmacy for methotrexate best prices for usa..viagra cheap altace dosage non prescription alternatives to nexium viagra holland online pharmacy india cialis meclizine over the counter brands buy viramune dosing zocor lowest price pakistan buy pain meds online no prescription obat flagyl benzoyl metronidazole prilosec without prescription xenical to bye ace drug store forcedtocum viagra paypal france article 58 cialis sales canada safe viagra online non prescription 200mg celebrex lasix pills from canada buy deprenyl online compare prices on viagra buy viagra super active 100mg non rx ed drugs purchasing propranolol buy celadrin online fucidin cream usa xenical from philippines mtabs scam viagra drink order chloroquinine from canada sildenafil 100mg online cheap abayas for sale canadian pills buying prednisone without precision norvasc 5 mg cheap scadenza brevetto cialis bupropion hcl xl mygra sildenafil tablets order paroxetine where to buy atarax us cheapest viagra generic zovirax online today over the counter ed pills walgreens cialis mail order usa discount prescriptions viamedic ,com hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg 0n line pharmacy viagra newyork buy brahmi leaves nolvadex certified canadian pharmacy cialis generic canada lokvogel kraai crestor online order return alli for sale online canada pharmacy to buy accutane in canadian chesp viagra overnight delivery how can i get lamictal treat bipolar perfect rx tadalafil toradol 10mg street price buy sanovitra online buy effexor online overnight entocort canadian pharmacies mail order paypal order cialisis with out prescription associazione culturale table and chair rentals temple texas where can i purchase serevent located dadha pharma online viagra fosamax online order can minocin no script does pharmacies in mexico sell clomid viagra finland levoxyl cialis shop online buy online viagra keflex albuterol sulfate no rx go chewable erection levitra 20mg on web selegiline buy brand viagra how do i take bupropion buy cheap cialis and viagra on line torsemide equals how much lasix silagra pas cher buy authentic viagra online cialis generique quality diclofenac is generic for propecia pharmacy will alli diet pills become available purmycin where can i get suprax tadalafil 20mg uk price where can i purchase prandin used be sactisfied with voltaren dosage instructions viagra paypal accepted canada